Teams

VCC GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs SS-LT YELLOWWon 40
W#1 DoublesMelissa Blake / Kirklyn Simonton vs Kristin Mabbutt / Joey Rothman6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCourtney Forman vs Jennifer Garbiso Hall6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDana Henry / Kelly Kelly vs Christine Paulsson / Anasa Shank6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Stewart / Courtney Ring vs Lynn Pearson / Susana Wanken4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-07vs PCRK REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesKirklyn Simonton / Debbie Groves vs Christine Aberle / Ashley Wilson3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCourtney Forman vs Anne Mills6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDana Henry / Kristen Adams vs Sally Avery / Melissa Rogers7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Stewart / Courtney Ring vs Jane Hetherington / Julie Whipple6-3, 6-0
2026-06-30vs CPV BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesKristen Adams / Debbie Groves vs Somsi Stringer / Angela Rose6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKirklyn Simonton vs Melissa Palmer6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Blake / Danelle Morgan vs Britney Anderson / Yvette Watson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDana Henry / Susan Stewart vs Mayme McDonald / Karen Wilson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-23vs PRC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Adams / Kirklyn Simonton vs Jacqueline Hash / Marcie Manuello7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCourtney Forman vs Krissy Hanna6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Groves / Bea Barnes vs Denise Dickson / Colleen Carlson3-6, 5-7
2026-06-16vs PCC GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesDebbie Groves / Kristen Adams vs Jill Hanafee / Susan Martin6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCourtney Forman vs Stacey Hayward6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMelissa Blake / Danelle Morgan vs Julie Eisenrich / Lisa Hossack6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDana Henry / Suzanne Martinek vs Ann Siebert / Beth Misner6-0, 6-1
2026-06-09vs SS-LT YELLOWWon 31
W#1 DoublesDanelle Morgan / Courtney Ring vs Rene Concialdi / VANESSA BERNAL4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKirklyn Simonton vs Susana Wanken6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBea Barnes / Susan Stewart vs Nantida Hong / Celine Ormond6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Kelly / Barbara Weisberg vs Sarah May / Joey Rothman1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-02vs PCRK REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesKristen Adams / Debbie Groves vs Jody Mumaugh / Janelle Williams6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCourtney Forman vs Anne Mills1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDana Henry / Courtney Ring vs Lindsey Talaga / Ashley Wilson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBea Barnes / Danelle Morgan vs Melissa Rogers / Julie Whipple5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Kristen Adams
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.95
Kirklyn Simonton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.95
Courtney Forman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.82
Dana Henry
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.80
Melissa Blake
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Debbie Groves
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Courtney Ring
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Bea Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Danelle Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Kelly Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Barbara Weisberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Suzanne Martinek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Groves + Kristen Adams21662% games+7.8% vs expected
Kristen Adams + Melissa Blake7261% games+3.6% vs expected
Kristen Adams + Kirklyn Simonton5260% games+3.3% vs expected
Debbie Groves + Kirklyn Simonton8358% games+0.5% vs expected
Kelly Kelly + Dana Henry3254% games−0.1% vs expected
Courtney Ring + Dana Henry7550% games−0.8% vs expected
Melissa Blake + Danelle Morgan3252% games−2.5% vs expected
Kristen Adams + Courtney Ring5159% games−7.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Adams
141W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.97
Kirklyn Simonton
32W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Courtney Forman
103W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Dana Henry
37W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Melissa Blake
25W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Debbie Groves
104W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Courtney Ring
70W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Bea Barnes
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Danelle Morgan
51W–63L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
Kelly Kelly
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Barbara Weisberg
40W–68L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Suzanne Martinek
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.