Teams

HERM-Chesson

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-02-25vs RAIN-LyonsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAMY LINES / Douglas Lines vs Jared Gnazzo / Marcy Gnazzo6-2, 6-1
2023-02-04vs BURK-SweeneyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Fitzgerald / AMY LINES vs Scott Childs / Teresa Landes-Shuler6-2, 6-3
2023-01-07vs MAC-LozaWon 10
W#2 DoublesDouglas Lines / AMY LINES vs Timea Harisova / John Rogers1-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
AMY LINES
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.33
Turner Broughton
published
3.27
Andrea Broughton
published 3.5
3.16
Lauren Hutcheson
published
2.78
Harjit Vohra
published
2.69
Douglas Lines
published
2.69
Alexia Gerczak
published 3
2.67
Alison Chesson
published 3
2.58
Samuel Adams
published
2.47
Wendy Stone
published
Jessica Tindel
published
Lesley Alouf
published
Ralph Whitt
published
Richard Locke
published
Rob Chesson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Broughton + Turner Broughton6356% games+12.3% vs expected
AMY LINES + Douglas Lines3450% games−3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
219W–86L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.96
Turner Broughton
27W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Andrea Broughton
23W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Lauren Hutcheson
21W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.16
Harjit Vohra
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
2.78
Douglas Lines
14W–24L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Alexia Gerczak
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Alison Chesson
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
Samuel Adams
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.58
Wendy Stone
2W–17L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.47
Jessica Tindel
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lesley Alouf
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ralph Whitt
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Locke
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rob Chesson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.