Teams

BIR HENDERSON/CURLEY

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Jill Pham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
3.83
Debbie Henderson
published 4
3.76
Natalie Ricketts
published
Cori Bryan
published 4
3.74
Tracy Slicker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Kristi McGuire
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Lisa Swauger
published
3.63
Amelia Yeh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Ruth WeinmannLopez
published
3.62
Gina Stewart
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.56
Theresa Rhoades
published
3.54
Kathleen Czaicki
published
3.49
Sue Peters
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Shawna Maginniss
published
3.45
Judy Watts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Jennifer Curley
published
3.21
Renee Yackira
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Marcela Romero
published
Hannah Ricketts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Slicker + Kristi McGuire1449% games+3.8% vs expected
Sue Peters + Kristi McGuire3446% games−2.8% vs expected
Debbie Henderson + Theresa Rhoades3259% gamesnot enough data
Amelia Yeh + Judy Watts224 matchesnot enough data
Sue Peters + Kathleen Czaicki303 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Henderson + Tracy Slicker303 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Slicker + Jill Pham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Pham
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Luz Cristina Rodriguez
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Debbie Henderson
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Natalie Ricketts
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Cori Bryan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Slicker
41W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Kristi McGuire
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Lisa Swauger
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Amelia Yeh
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Ruth WeinmannLopez
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Gina Stewart
23W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Theresa Rhoades
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kathleen Czaicki
10W–0L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Sue Peters
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Shawna Maginniss
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Judy Watts
7W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Jennifer Curley
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Renee Yackira
25W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Marcela Romero
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Hannah Ricketts
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.