Teams

LA-LLW-Queen Anne 3.5W-Brittany Blackie

2024 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-09vs LA - MountainGate GatorsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrittany Blackie / Isis Anderson vs Alice Wilson / Stephanie Atkinson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGraciela Gutierrez / Jean Kim vs Sarah Kilpatrick / Simone Friedman6-3, 6-4
2024-11-03vs LA - Victorious SecretWon 10
W#3 DoublesEriana Blankinship / Diana Chow vs Sharona Malekan / Cindy Gaytan6-0, 7-6
2024-10-26vs LA - LATCLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrittany Blackie / Isis Anderson vs Hilary Marx / Devin O'Fallon2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Chow / Eriana Blankinship vs Megan Drynan / Marnie Owens5-7, 4-6
2024-10-20vs LA - Canyon Coyotes 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesGraciela Gutierrez / Jean Kim vs Michelle Fowler / Karen Kice6-1, 6-3
2024-10-13vs LA - Cheviot HillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesIsis Anderson / Brittany Blackie vs Kara Brevet / Reanne Charuhas7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJean Kim / Emily Tong vs Brenna Opelka / Justine Lassoff3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-09-29vs LA - Shadow's AcesWon 20
W#2 DoublesJean Kim / Graciela Gutierrez vs Stephanie Meyer / Fay Gauthier6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVirginia Takeuchi / Caroline Harris vs Harriet Fraser / Kate Davies3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-22vs LA - Slice GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesIsis Anderson / Brittany Blackie vs Julie Warshaw / Soyeon Kim6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGraciela Gutierrez / Jean Kim vs Rina Matsuoka / Susan Lee6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEriana Blankinship / Caroline Harris vs Kinsey Ball / Camila Hatkoff1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-09-15vs LA - Downtown Aces 3.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesIsis Anderson / Brittany Blackie vs Maryann Brandon / Fariba Navid6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEriana Blankinship / Femke Maassen vs Kat Kim / Gordana Raca6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Isis Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.88
Charlotte Gray
published 4
3.85
Brittany Blackie
published 4
3.69
Jean Kim
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Eriana Blankinship
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Virginia Takeuchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Graciela Gutierrez
published
Seldy Gray
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Isis Anderson
95W–40L career · 9 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4
Charlotte Gray
12W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Brittany Blackie
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.85
Jean Kim
30W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Eriana Blankinship
80W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Virginia Takeuchi
112W–106L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Graciela Gutierrez
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
Seldy Gray
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.