Teams

CV-Ringer

2024 CV Masters' 70s League · CV-Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-29vs CV-GiacominiWon 10
W#2 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Farzaneh Kia vs Eileen Clark / Jackie Brown2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-02-27vs CV-ParkersonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Farzaneh Kia vs Wendy Hawley / Sally Mangina3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Simpson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Jandi Fraser / Edna Swart6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-22vs CV-ParkersonLost 02
L#1 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Farzaneh Kia vs Sally Mangina / Wendy Hawley2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Donna Simpson vs Jill Lawrence Polls / Jandi Fraser1-6, 2-6
2024-02-15Lost 01
L#4 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Theresa Brown vs Deborah Rogers / Hiyam van der Wilde3-6, 0-6
2024-02-13vs CV-ParkersonWon 20
W#2 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Farzaneh Kia vs Jandi Fraser / Roberta Dierks6-0, 6-3
W#5 DoublesKaren Meyer / Rebecca Bratlien vs Jean Kechely / JUDY MCLENNAN6-0, 6-2
2024-01-25vs CV-WillseyLost 01
L#2 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Barbara Johns vs Kerry MacPherson / Patrice Dicasparro7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-01-18vs CV-GiacominiLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra House / Rebecca Bratlien vs Janet Daniel / Diane Fass7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-01-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Simpson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Dee Strecker / Marilou Rolfe2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Farzaneh Kia
published 4
Gay Hart
published 4
3.66
Donna Simpson
published 3.5
3.54
Colleen Muhlbradt
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.29
Rebecca Bratlien
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.10
Barbara Johns
published 3.5
Marianne Roth
published
Martha Church
published
Mary Kern
published
MaryLynn Murphy
published
Monica Sabo
published
Nancy Yazel
published
Nora Vrabek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Bratlien + Donna Simpson6070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Farzaneh Kia
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Gay Hart
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Donna Simpson
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.66
4
Colleen Muhlbradt
109W–92L career · 5 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Rebecca Bratlien
35W–68L career · 6 lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Barbara Johns
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
Marianne Roth
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Church
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Kern
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
MaryLynn Murphy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Sabo
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Yazel
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nora Vrabek
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.