Teams

Ry.Madison18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-07-30vs Ca.Pena18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesTaylor Atherton vs Camilo Pena4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-07-23Won 30
W#1 SinglesTaylor Atherton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNate Wireback vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSheldon Roberts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-16vs Ba.Yusuf18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesSheldon Roberts vs Andrew Chan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesNate Wireback vs Mason Dye6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-09vs Ma.Roschel18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesTaylor Atherton vs Chris Wandor2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-02vs Fr.Burbano18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesNate Wireback vs Alex Radulovic5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-06-25vs Ca.Pena18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSheldon Roberts vs Doug Silverman5-7, 0-6
W#3 SinglesTaylor Atherton vs Camilo Pena3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-06-18vs De.Farmer18S3.5Won 10
W#3 SinglesSheldon Roberts vs Willie Frierson6-0, 6-1
2024-06-11Lost 02
L#1 SinglesTaylor Atherton vs Ty Giggey2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesNate Wireback vs Baaqir Yusuf5-7, 5-7
2024-06-08vs Ma.Roschel18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesSheldon Roberts vs Matthew Durbin7-5, 6-2
2024-05-28vs Fr.Burbano18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesTaylor Atherton vs Vaibhav Parmar6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesNate Wireback vs Montgomery Fletcher6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Nate Wireback
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.64
Sheldon Roberts
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.62
Taylor Atherton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.55
Ryan Madison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Atherton + Sheldon Roberts7264% games+9.4% vs expected
Taylor Atherton + Nate Wireback6260% games+6.7% vs expected
Nate Wireback + Sheldon Roberts314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nate Wireback
96W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.71
3.5
Sheldon Roberts
63W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.64
3.5
Taylor Atherton
78W–31L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.62
Joseph Hollingsworth
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
Ryan Madison
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.