Teams

Fee Rats

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over NA - Brevard Men's Tnns League · 4.0-5.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-03vs Fee Gold of CortezLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesDaniel Flores / Trey Crowley vs James Knepper / Jim Peterson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-19vs Desoto Kevin's LackeysLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesEmilio Ampuero / Daniel Flores vs Joel Mayer / Kevin Lackey6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-02-19vs Rockledge RockersWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesDaniel Flores / Jacob Kargauer vs Andy McConnell / William Rocker7-5, 6-2
2026-02-12vs Fee Gold of CortezWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesDaniel Flores / Jacob Kargauer vs James Knepper / Jim Peterson6-1, 6-1
W#2 Male DoublesKenneth Moore / Michael Runda vs Jyothishkumar Unnikrishnan Nair / Gregory Whitaker6-3, 6-4
2026-02-05vs Desoto Kevin's LackeysWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesDaniel Flores / Jacob Kargauer vs Kyle Hine / Joel Mayer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-29vs Rockledge Ol' Timers+Won 10
W#1 Male DoublesJacob Kargauer / Daniel Flores vs Leonardo DaSilva / Jeff Sidor6-2, 7-5
2026-01-22vs EFSC The Wild WestmorelandsWon 10
W#2 Male DoublesEmilio Ampuero / Michael Runda vs Juan Lebron / Patrick McGuigan6-1, 6-1
2026-01-15vs Rockledge RockersWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesJacob Kargauer / Daniel Flores vs Shawn Coleman / Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues6-3, 6-1
2026-01-08vs Fee Gold of CortezWon 10
W#2 Male DoublesMitchel Dubolsky / Michael Runda vs Alec Nguyen / Jyothishkumar Unnikrishnan Nair7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0-5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Emilio Ampuero
published
4.25
Jacob Kargauer
published
4.02
Daniel Flores
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Trey Crowley
published
3.82
Daniel Evans
published 4
3.72
Michael Runda
usually #2 Male Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Kenneth Moore
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emilio Ampuero
14W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.42
Jacob Kargauer
19W–5L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Daniel Flores
19W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
Trey Crowley
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Daniel Evans
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Michael Runda
65W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Kenneth Moore
2W–11L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.