Teams

EBlount-HR

2025 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-23vs BBlackburn-CHTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesErik J Erikson / Phil Korest vs BRYAN WRIGHT / Kenneth Phares6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWilliam Calhoun / William Lillard vs Sudhanshu Handa / Boyd Blackburn4-6, 2-6
2025-09-16vs BBlackburn-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesErik J Erikson / Phil Korest vs Chris Combs / Kenneth Phares4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Calhoun / William Lillard vs Boyd Blackburn / BRYAN WRIGHT7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-09vs BBlackburn-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesErik J Erikson / Phil Korest vs Boyd Blackburn / Wendell Gilland4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-26vs BBlackburn-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesEric Labow / William Lillard vs Nathan Bearman / Chris Combs5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-19vs BBlackburn-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesErik J Erikson / William Lillard vs Sudhanshu Handa / Nathan Bearman1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
David Slack
published 4.5
4.17
William Calhoun
published
4.13
Erik J Erikson
published
4.07
Jon Koceja
published
3.65
Eddie Blount
published 4
3.55
Phil Korest
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.48
William Lillard
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Eric Labow
published
Greg Matera
published
Hien Jimmy Nguyen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eddie Blount + Phil Korest033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Slack
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
William Calhoun
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Erik J Erikson
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
Jon Koceja
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Eddie Blount
41W–44L career · type S · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Phil Korest
43W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
William Lillard
50W–58L career · 9 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.48
Eric Labow
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg Matera
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Hien Jimmy Nguyen
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.