← Teams

WHRC-Dobashi

2019 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Frank Collie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
—
Ahmad Garakani
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Judith Kobin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Deborah Borchers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.31
Greg van Gasse
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Bill Lowblad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Alison Davis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.76
Randolph Splitter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-06-08Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesColleen Stroeder / Randolph Splitter vs Diana Almy / Vincent Scopacasa6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlison Davis / Frank Collie vs Michelle Day-Wirth / Jeff Gulley6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBill Lowblad / Deborah Borchers vs Prasad Kenkaraseril / Karen Pickering6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2019-06-07Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesFrank Collie / Alison Davis vs Donna Kennish / Neil Soiffer7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesColleen Stroeder / Randolph Splitter vs Julie Hansen / Danny Denning3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Kobin / Alan Montrose vs Michael Sheridan / Arlene Doughty7-5, 7-5
2019-06-02Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesNaomi Steinberg / Greg van Gasse vs Frank Olson / Misty Bettis6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAhmad Garakani / Kay Dobashi vs Thomas Lockhart / Rise Hawley7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFrank Collie / Gisele Lamarre vs Penny Birkhofer / Bruce Yang6-3, 6-2
2019-05-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRandolph Splitter / Colleen Stroeder vs Tony Moreno / Roxanne Imbrie6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudith Kobin / Greg van Gasse vs Ken Crowley / Patricia Sturr6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKyoko Adcock / Ahmad Garakani vs Donna Roisom / Craig Mills4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-05-05Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesFrank Collie / Gisele Lamarre vs Neal Burgstahler / Nancy Korenek-Leveque7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJudith Kobin / Greg van Gasse vs John Judge / Susan Judge3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-04-28Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesGisele Lamarre / Frank Collie vs Donald Pettitt / Kathryn Smith6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Bill Lowblad vs Rick Wong / Eileen Reid7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2019-04-14Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesGisele Lamarre / Frank Collie vs Peter Aleman / Sandra Seyler6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGreg van Gasse / Kyoko Adcock vs Jim Hopkins / Carol Chiu6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesColleen Stroeder / Ahmad Garakani vs Kevin Le / Sandy Reilly6-3, 7-5
2019-04-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesColleen Stroeder / Ahmad Garakani vs Jack Henry / Catherine Go6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKyoko Adcock / Greg van Gasse vs Bill Henderson / Reidun Zander6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Bill Lowblad vs Peggy Jaques / Harold Rohrbach6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Frank Collie
144W–54L career
0%99%1%
4.21
4
Ahmad Garakani
47W–39L career
not enough data
—
4
Judith Kobin
90W–95L career
34%66%0%
3.50
4
Deborah Borchers
53W–101L career
46%54%0%
3.46
3.5
Greg van Gasse
8W–22L career
2%94%4%
3.31
3.5
Bill Lowblad
92W–61L career
1%97%2%
3.30
3.5
Alison Davis
80W–62L career
27%73%1%
3.08
3
Randolph Splitter
7W–30L career
7%87%6%
2.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.