Teams

4-TBrooks-Eno-18 8.0

2023 Eno River Mixed 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult Mixed 8.0 Evening

14 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2023-07-19vs 1-MPaul-Eno-18 8.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Amber Cagle vs Elizabeth Harvie / Ivan Ross6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura McNiven / Brandon Keisner vs Laurie Straube / Madison Alexander6-1, 6-4
2023-07-17vs 1-MPaul-Eno-18 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesRichard McClenny / Amber Cagle vs Ivan Ross / Elizabeth Harvie6-4, 6-3
2023-07-12vs 6-APlachco-EnoWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Nancy Pack vs Tyler Carroll / Justyne Ross6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmber Cagle / Simon Cagle vs Katherine Leib / Eric Lindblom7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTerry Perrone / Patrick Newsome vs Emily Culbreth / Eddie Blount6-4, 6-2
2023-07-11vs 7-SZIKSAI/SHANE-EnoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAmber Cagle / Simon Cagle vs Luc Sanchez / Rebecca Reynolds6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRichard McClenny / Traci Brooks vs Sindhu Shivaji / Joshua Harford4-6, 1-6
2023-07-11vs 5-HRoss-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerry Perrone / Simon Cagle vs Lucas Hubbard / Lynsey Easley7-6, 7-5
2023-07-10vs 5-HRoss-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesTerry Perrone / Patrick Newsome vs Heidi Ross / Taylor Oakley6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrandon Keisner / Laura McNiven vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-05vs 7-SZIKSAI/SHANE-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmber Cagle / Simon Cagle vs Sergii Porokh / Sindhu Shivaji6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatrick Newsome / Terry Perrone vs Betsy Shane / Barry Gooch6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-03vs 6-APlachco-EnoLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Pack / Richard McClenny vs Elaine Schnabel / Michael Weslander6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAmber Cagle / Simon Cagle vs Jane Williams / Tyler Carroll3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerry Perrone / Erik J Erikson vs Ana Plachco / Dash Rajarajhan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-05vs 2-LBolger-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNancy Pack / Patrick Newsome vs Patrick Grant / Kristen Fuller6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAmber Cagle / Simon Cagle vs Justin Akonful / Hillary Mulder6-7, 2-6
2023-05-31vs 2-LBolger-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatt Piland / Tenesha Carter vs Hillary Mulder / Justin Akonful3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSimon Cagle / Amber Cagle vs Joshua Collins / Christina Aldereguia2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-24vs 3-Rupert/Tomkins-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesTenesha Carter / Matt Piland vs Will Lassiter / Leah Weinberger6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTerry Perrone / Richard McClenny vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-22vs 3-Rupert/Tomkins-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesTenesha Carter / Patrick Newsome vs Leah Weinberger / Daniel Branston6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTerry Perrone / Richard McClenny vs Brook Holton Sheahan / Scott Benson6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult Mixed 8.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Simon Cagle
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.25
Richard McClenny
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
4.24
Erik J Erikson
published 4.5
4.24
Patrick Newsome
published
4.21
Patrick Shields
published
4.02
Nancy Pack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Matt Piland
published
3.87
3.85
Laura McNiven
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Danielle Rowe
published 4
3.71
Amber Cagle
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.46
Terry Perrone
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.22
Tenesha Carter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.01
Traci Brooks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Cagle + Simon Cagle4250% gamesnot enough data
Gabrielle Shields + Patrick Shields303 matchesnot enough data
Tenesha Carter + Richard McClenny303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Simon Cagle
102W–38L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Richard McClenny
432W–130L career · 11 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Erik J Erikson
32W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
4.24
Patrick Newsome
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
Patrick Shields
43W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Nancy Pack
296W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
Matt Piland
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Gabrielle Shields
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Laura McNiven
352W–122L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Danielle Rowe
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Amber Cagle
216W–100L career · 13 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Terry Perrone
406W–264L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Tenesha Carter
196W–124L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Traci Brooks
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.