Teams

OC Palisades - Alan

OC Winter Team Singles · OC Men 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-26vs OC LLW NBTC - Gino - Sat1Lost 12
L#1 SinglesGregory Little vs Gino Aielli1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTom Courtney vs Anthony Wright2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesJeffrey Fracalosy vs Dan Rodrigues7-5, 6-4
2026-03-28vs OC Newport BluffsLost 03
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Fracalosy vs Thien-Tin Le2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Brainard vs Luca Roth3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesGregory Little vs Kyle Thompson1-6, 1-6
2026-03-21vs OC LLW NBTC - Gino - Sat1Lost 03
L#1 SinglesGregory Little vs Michael Smith1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRyan Hellmers vs Daniel Tat2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesTom Courtney vs Michael Cohen1-6, 1-6
2026-02-28vs OC LLW NBTC - Gino - Sat1Lost 03
L#1 SinglesMatthew Brainard vs Anthony Wright2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHarry Packer vs Daniel Tat3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJeffrey Fracalosy vs Scott Frick2-6, 2-6
2026-02-14vs OC Newport BluffsLost 03
L#1 SinglesBryson Eastwood vs Luca Roth1-6, 1-3
L#2 SinglesRyan Hellmers vs Dion Jaffee3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJeffrey Fracalosy vs Conner Ueberroth1-6, 1-6
2026-02-07vs OC LLW NBTC - Gino - Sat1Lost 12
L#1 SinglesDerek Hsu vs Anthony Wright2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBryson Eastwood vs Daryl Lowenstein7-6, 6-2
L#3 SinglesHarry Packer vs Dan Rodrigues2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · OC Men 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Newport Bluffs5113510101
2OC LLW NBTC - Gino - Sat15315920183
3OC Palisades - Alan0621632205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Derek Hsu
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.91
Gregory Little
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.81
Matthew Brainard
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.79
Harry Packer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Bryson Eastwood
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.70
Jeffrey Fracalosy
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #3 Singles 36% · published
3.37
Tom Courtney
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Ryan Hellmers
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Derek Hsu
11W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
4.07
Gregory Little
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.91
Matthew Brainard
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Harry Packer
4W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Bryson Eastwood
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeffrey Fracalosy
16W–15L career · 11 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Tom Courtney
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.37
Ryan Hellmers
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.