Teams

TLSLE-Lerme/Jetton 40 Tri B

2025 Lake USTA Tri Level 40 & Over · Women's Division B (4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-21vs TLKBU-Buaron/CSDLost 01
L#2 DoublesKipsy Gould / Karla Williams vs Jaime Cooper / Allison Terry3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSherry Lerme / Karla Williams vs Alva Bates / Wanda Thomas5-7, 3-6
2025-07-11vs TLLLE-LEVY/HolbrookSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKarla Williams / Kathleen Morrow vs Odette Baker / Patty Smith5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDelia Graham / Wendy Mizicko vs Carol Kearney / Sheila Hebert5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-27vs TLSMC-McCue-Rorech/Jetton 40 Tri BSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSherry Lerme / Kipsy Gould vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAya Love / Wendy Mizicko vs Shelly McCue / Lee Bierer2-6, 3-6
2025-06-20vs TLKAT-Atkins/Jetton 40+ BWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Morrow / Karla Williams vs Brooke Hondros / Mary Kay Portaro7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-13vs TLMSM-Smith-Winter/LNRC TRI BLost 01
L#3 DoublesWendy Mizicko / Aya Love vs Laura Gottlieb / Nancy Bessler1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Division B (4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Eren Hendricks
published
3.49
Gina Martin
published
3.38
Myra Kruger
published
3.36
Karla Williams
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Sherry Lerme
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Patricia Arrowood
published
2.92
Delia Graham
published 3
2.68
Wendy Mizicko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Cathy Mcdonald
published 3
2.07
Bethany Zipf
published 2.5
Lisa Wilkens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Myra Kruger + Gina Martin404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eren Hendricks
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Gina Martin
18W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Myra Kruger
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Karla Williams
377W–168L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Sherry Lerme
90W–106L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Patricia Arrowood
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Delia Graham
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Wendy Mizicko
35W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Cathy Mcdonald
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Bethany Zipf
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Lisa Wilkens
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.