Teams

Solo 6.0 XD

2026 55&Over Mixed · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-15vs Southern: Dutchess: All Mixed UpSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarol Incledon / Michael O'Connor vs Kelly Curran / Erwin Watson0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Casey / Paul Curran vs Maria Moise / Anthony Frangione7-5, 6-3
2026-01-16vs Southern: Dutchess: All Mixed UpLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Casey / Daniel Lewis vs Nita Ballantyne / Todd Redl5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlex Etsuko Rosenblum / Jim Brocker vs Jennifer Reap / Ajoy Lahiri2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMonica Lewis / Paul Curran vs Elizabeth Hammond / Andrew Benedict6-1, 6-4
2026-01-11vs Southern: Dutchess: All Mixed UpLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Incledon / Daniel Lewis vs Nita Ballantyne / Todd Redl2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlex Etsuko Rosenblum / Lawrence Kunz vs Maria Moise / Andrew Benedict1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Casey / Paul Curran vs Kelly Maloney / Joe Goldsmith6-3, 6-2
2025-12-13vs Southern: Dutchess: All Mixed UpLost 02
L#2 DoublesPaul Curran / Carol Incledon vs Elizabeth Hammond / Anthony Frangione3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarmina Magno McGovern / James Mcgovern vs Joe Goldsmith / Christina Bookless4-6, 2-6
2025-12-05vs Southern: Dutchess: All Mixed UpLost 12
L#1 DoublesSachiko Miller / Daniel Lewis vs Diana Regini / Todd Redl4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Incledon / Jim Brocker vs Kelly Maloney / Philippe Cotennec7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCarmina Magno McGovern / James Mcgovern vs Maria Moise / Anthony Frangione1-6, 3-6
2025-11-22vs Southern: Dutchess: All Mixed UpLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlex Etsuko Rosenblum / Paul Curran vs Nita Ballantyne / Todd Redl4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Poblete-Haubrich / Michael O'Connor vs Kelly Curran / Philippe Cotennec0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Liebeck-Smith / Lawrence Kunz vs Christina Bookless / Ajoy Lahiri3-6, 1-6
2025-11-16vs Southern: Dutchess: All Mixed UpLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarmina Magno McGovern / James Mcgovern vs Diana Regini / Todd Redl0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Lewis / Jim Brocker vs Jennifer Reap / Joe Goldsmith3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Liebeck-Smith / Lawrence Kunz vs Elizabeth Hammond / Philippe Cotennec0-6, 0-6
2025-11-08vs Southern: Dutchess: All Mixed UpSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSachiko Miller / Daniel Lewis vs Kelly Maloney / Anthony Frangione6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrea Casey / Michael O'Connor vs Maria Moise / Ajoy Lahiri2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southern: Dutchess: All Mixed Up0819513143
2Solo 6.0 XD0851938257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Paul Curran
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.86
Carol Incledon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Andrea Casey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Daniel Lewis
published 3
2.74
Michael O'Connor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Jim Brocker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Sachiko Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Jacqueline Poblete-Haubrich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Monica Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Alex Etsuko Rosenblum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Carmina Magno McGovern
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.31
Laura Liebeck-Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lawrence Kunz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawrence Kunz + Laura Liebeck-Smith0515% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Casey + Paul Curran213 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Poblete-Haubrich + Michael O'Connor033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Curran
47W–58L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Carol Incledon
31W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Andrea Casey
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Daniel Lewis
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Michael O'Connor
1W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Jim Brocker
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Sachiko Miller
8W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Jacqueline Poblete-Haubrich
12W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Monica Lewis
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
3
Alex Etsuko Rosenblum
11W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Carmina Magno McGovern
45W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
Laura Liebeck-Smith
9W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.31
Lawrence Kunz
5W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.