Teams

LCulp/SDeVries (Col Beatty)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-10vs DCombis (River Hills CC)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesSara DeVries vs Sophie Karsch4-6, 4-6
2023-05-04vs SHarris (Windyrush)Split 11
L#2 DoublesLauren Culp / Sara DeVries vs Arden Smith / Tina Robinson2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHaley Barnes / Stacey Valitchka vs Katie Fellows / Joannie Prouty6-2, 6-1
2023-04-20vs HFranc/SRock (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSiobhan Papa / Sara DeVries vs Allyson McDonough / Diana Blocker0-6, 1-6
2023-04-17vs KLee/SChandra (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTeresa Riley vs Mayela Magur2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-04-13vs AMinish (Lifetime)Won 10
W#3 DoublesStacey Valitchka / Debbie Glass vs Jasmine Fontaine / Whitney Axley-Andrews6-3, 6-1
2023-03-30vs DMaguire (Park Rd)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTeresa Riley vs Cynthia Hoover3-6, 1-6
2023-03-16vs MBizon (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStacey Valitchka / Kristin Baker vs Margot Bizon / Jenny Carlson3-6, 1-6
2023-03-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesTeresa Riley vs Sarah Cunningham6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2023-03-09vs SHarris (Windyrush)Split 11
L#1 SinglesTeresa Riley vs Katy Surlea2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSiobhan Papa / Stacey Valitchka vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Siobhan Papa
published
2.96
Cori Niemann
published 3
2.96
Teresa Riley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.71
Sara DeVries
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.67
Lauren Culp
published
2.57
Stacey Valitchka
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Carrie Letorney
published 3
2.30
Alli Petersen
published 2.5
2.29
Debbie Glass
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara DeVries + Lauren Culp1742% games+4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Siobhan Papa
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.09
3
Cori Niemann
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Teresa Riley
70W–74L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Sara DeVries
30W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Lauren Culp
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%11%89%
2.67
3
Stacey Valitchka
22W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Carrie Letorney
15W–29L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Alli Petersen
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Debbie Glass
5W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.