Teams

GR Kessel FWL A55-7.0W

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 55&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI FWL A55&O 7.0 W (6 player)

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WMI FWL A55&O 7.0 W (6 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Julie Gardzinski
published
3.53
Luann Mullen
published
3.35
Gayl Kessel
published 3.5
Elizabeth Hamm
published 3.5
3.19
Kelli Kovack
published
3.18
Lin Vermeulen
published
3.15
Tracie Riebschleger
published
2.72
Laurie Herremans
published
2.59
Barbara Draft
published 3.5
Suzanne Gianino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Kovack + Tracie Riebschleger5451% games+5.5% vs expected
Lin Vermeulen + Gayl Kessel12653% games+4.4% vs expected
Gayl Kessel + Kelli Kovack5354% games−0.2% vs expected
Gayl Kessel + Julie Gardzinski7356% games−0.2% vs expected
Lin Vermeulen + Kelli Kovack2549% games−3.4% vs expected
Kelli Kovack + Laurie Herremans31040% games−4.4% vs expected
Laurie Herremans + Tracie Riebschleger22136% games−8.9% vs expected
Barbara Draft + Laurie Herremans0617% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Gardzinski
104W–60L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
Luann Mullen
193W–129L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Gayl Kessel
129W–140L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Elizabeth Hamm
11W–43L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelli Kovack
41W–76L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Lin Vermeulen
73W–56L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Tracie Riebschleger
64W–60L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Laurie Herremans
20W–101L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
2.72
3.5
Barbara Draft
4W–14L career · type S · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.59
Suzanne Gianino
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.