Teams

Team 1 Unstrung Heroes

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-22vs Team 4 RBGCC 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChungchi Yao / Mikhail Velasco vs Mel Wesley / Mario Levine3-6, 1-6
2024-07-20vs Team 2 Ageless All StarsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Clayton / Mikhail Velasco vs Chandler Fox / Thomas Zavilla7-5, 6-2
2024-07-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesMikhail Velasco / Chungchi Yao vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-25vs Team 5 Backhand BanditsWon 10
W#2 DoublesTed Kim / Chungchi Yao vs Keith Wojciech / Majed Hamawy7-6, 4-2
2024-06-23vs Team 4 RBGCC 3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesChungchi Yao / Christopher Dopita vs Mel Wesley / James Colucci6-4, 6-1
2024-06-15vs Team 3 Clay MiserablesWon 10
W#1 DoublesChungchi Yao / Ted Kim vs Jay Ghazal / Joseph Libby7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-07vs Team 2 Ageless All StarsWon 10
W#1 DoublesChungchi Yao / Christopher Dopita vs Chandler Fox / Mark Jenkins6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesMikhail Velasco / Craig Pickering vs Steven McCool / Eric Wagner7-6, 3-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Kevin Conaway
published
2.83
Tyler Duvall
published
2.81
Craig Clayton
published 3
2.75
Chungchi Yao
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Mikhail Velasco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Rob Wright
published
2.50
Raymond Barry
published
2.48
Craig Pickering
published 3
Ted Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chungchi Yao + Raymond Barry134 matchesnot enough data
Chungchi Yao + Ted Kim404 matchesnot enough data
Chungchi Yao + Mikhail Velasco213 matchesnot enough data
Rob Wright + Craig Pickering123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Conaway
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.63
Tyler Duvall
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Craig Clayton
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Chungchi Yao
77W–97L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Mikhail Velasco
42W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Rob Wright
2W–14L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.63
Raymond Barry
2W–14L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Craig Pickering
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Ted Kim
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.