Teams

McMullen Cribb

2024 Pinellas Combo 18 & Over Weekend Summer · 7.5 M Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-07vs Pinellas/Fantauzzo/18&Over7.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Partida / Israel Graveran vs James Price / Thomas Gross6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Cribb / Smith Lyon vs Brian Stone / Dustin Applebaum7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-08-24vs Seminole Lake Dsa 7.5 MWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Partida / Smith Lyon vs Brandon Halm / Ashton Fritz7-6, 6-3
2024-08-10vs Safety Harbor BanditosWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Partida / Israel Graveran vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Mark Nasworthy6-4, 6-1
2024-07-20vs Seminole Lake Dsa 7.5 MLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Cribb / Smith Lyon vs Kevin Burnett / Michael Issa6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBilly Schnell / William Agustin vs Pierre Lewin / Peter Martino1-6, 0-6
2024-07-13vs SPTC Holliday 7.5 MWon 10
W#2 DoublesBilly Schnell / Israel Graveran vs Parker Robichaud / Jermaine Flowers6-2, 6-3
2024-07-06vs Safety Harbor BanditosLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Partida / Henri Pichal vs Erik Breitenbach / James Bettencourt1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBilly Schnell / William Agustin vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Gorban Aliak2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Israel Graveran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Daniel Cribb
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.59
Daniel Partida
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.45
Billy Schnell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Smith Lyon
published
3.33
Mony Rodon
published
3.31
Michael Maas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Partida + Daniel Cribb1933% games−14.6% vs expected
Billy Schnell + Daniel Cribb1436% gamesnot enough data
Billy Schnell + Daniel Partida123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Israel Graveran
98W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Daniel Cribb
34W–73L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Daniel Partida
14W–43L career · 9 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Billy Schnell
20W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.45
Smith Lyon
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
Mony Rodon
18W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
Michael Maas
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.