Teams

Tang/ Knoxville

2025 Mixed 40 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0 Mixed 40&over

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-26vs Gosselin/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesYoko Umezawa / Hector Rodriguez vs Lindsey Stimets / Rob Gosselin3-6, 1-6
2025-07-19vs ClarkeLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatt Webster / Sheri Kilbey vs Jeff Sullivan / Bethany Hicks4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim Lee / Eric Arnsdorff vs Travis Turley / Tara Hurley2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesEve Tang / Hector Rodriguez vs Lauren Clarke / Scott Ellis6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-18vs Gosselin/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesNatalie Harrison / Matt Webster vs David Harano / Mei Ling Gingrich6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSheri Kilbey / Asad Malik vs Alfi Guindi / Wanda Williams3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesYoko Umezawa / Hector Rodriguez vs Jeff Goodfriend / Lynn Johnson2-6, 2-6
2025-07-11vs ClarkeLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Warrick / Hector Rodriguez vs Scott Ellis / Bethany Hicks4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Harrison / Eric Arnsdorff vs Lori Brown / Jeremy Tanarungsekul0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEve Tang / Matt Webster vs Brooke Browning / Nicholas Helle2-6, 3-6
2025-06-28vs Gosselin/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEve Tang / Hector Rodriguez vs Neal Arwood / Natalie Deel6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNatalie Harrison / Asad Malik vs Rob Gosselin / Lynn Johnson4-6, 1-6
2025-06-14vs ClarkeLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheri Kilbey / Eric Arnsdorff vs Jeff Sullivan / Barbara Miller4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYoko Umezawa / Asad Malik vs Lauren Clarke / Jason Brown0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNatalie Harrison / Hector Rodriguez vs Tara Hurley / Jeremy Tanarungsekul4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Mixed 40&over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gosselin/Knoxville5112614151
2Clarke4214411140
3Tang/ Knoxville0611734212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Sheri Kilbey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Asad Malik
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Eric Arnsdorff
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.53
Natalie Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Matt Webster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Eve Tang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Laura Warrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Yoko Umezawa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheri Kilbey
51W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Asad Malik
26W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Eric Arnsdorff
49W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.61
Natalie Harrison
14W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
Matt Webster
10W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Eve Tang
18W–28L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Laura Warrick
55W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Yoko Umezawa
15W–60L career · 8 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.