Teams

Court Jesters

2022 Adult 40 and Over League · 4.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-06vs Maui Moon DogsWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrayden Corniel / Ricky Tobita vs Ralph Gorgoglione / Harold Fernandez6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCharlie Crandall vs Kevin Hillman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKirk Tanaka / Jerry Delacruz vs Phillip Peterson / Curt DeCrinis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-27vs Maui Moon DogsLost 13
L#1 DoublesJerry Delacruz / Michael Baysa vs Ralph Gorgoglione / Kevin Hillman1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMaurice Zane vs Shaun Thayer5-2
L#2 DoublesChris Hassen / Charlie Crandall vs Robert Hanson / Rick Kepler6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJustin Locke / Ricky Tobita vs Harold Fernandez / Phillip Peterson5-7, 3-6
2022-02-12vs Maui Moon DogsLost 13
L#1 DoublesDane Luna / Ricky Tobita vs Rick Kepler / Curt DeCrinis0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesBrayden Corniel vs Robert Hanson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKirk Tanaka / Chris Hassen vs Ralph Gorgoglione / Kevin Hillman2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJerry Delacruz / Michael Baysa vs Harold Fernandez / Phillip Peterson4-6, 2-6
2022-01-30vs Maui Moon DogsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrayden Corniel / Maurice Zane vs Ralph Gorgoglione / Rick Camp2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCharlie Crandall vs Shaun Thayer3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJustin Locke / Ricky Tobita vs Phillip Peterson / Kevin Hillman6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDane Luna / Kirk Tanaka vs Curt DeCrinis / Frank Salvador6-2, 6-1
2022-01-16vs Maui Moon DogsLost 13
L#1 DoublesKirk Tanaka / Dane Luna vs Ralph Gorgoglione / Curt DeCrinis0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCharlie Crandall vs Rick Kepler7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJerry Delacruz / Justin Locke vs Kevin Hillman / Frank Salvador0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaurice Zane / Ricky Tobita vs Harold Fernandez / Shaun Thayer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-01-09vs Maui Moon DogsLost 13
W#1 DoublesKirk Tanaka / Brayden Corniel vs Kevin Hillman / Frank Salvador7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCharlie Crandall vs Shaun Thayer2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDane Luna / Jerry Delacruz vs Phillip Peterson / Harold Fernandez3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChris Hassen / Maurice Zane vs Robert Hanson / Rick Camp4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Charlie Crandall
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Kirk Tanaka
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Jerry Delacruz
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Ricky Tobita
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Chris Hassen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Marisa Fujimoto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.38
Lori Tanaka
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Brayden Corniel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Dane Luna
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Justin Locke
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Maurice Zane
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Michael Baysa
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jerry Delacruz + Justin Locke6163% games+9.8% vs expected
Kirk Tanaka + Jerry Delacruz311954% games+0.4% vs expected
Lori Tanaka + Marisa Fujimoto131651% games−3.5% vs expected
Jerry Delacruz + Marisa Fujimoto6946% games−5.8% vs expected
Dane Luna + Justin Locke314 matchesnot enough data
Jerry Delacruz + Michael Baysa134 matchesnot enough data
Jerry Delacruz + Chris Hassen314 matchesnot enough data
Chris Hassen + Justin Locke404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlie Crandall
52W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
4.14
4
Kirk Tanaka
109W–94L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Jerry Delacruz
126W–98L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Ricky Tobita
73W–90L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Chris Hassen
33W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Marisa Fujimoto
119W–93L career · 8 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Lori Tanaka
87W–111L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Brayden Corniel
16W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Dane Luna
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Justin Locke
57W–39L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maurice Zane
36W–44L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Baysa
34W–41L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.