Teams

Gramins- Son of Samson 18+ W23

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-02-28vs Torres/Syverson 18+ W23Won 10
W#3 DoublesNicholas Fisher / CRAIG STERN vs Jon Kruse / Kyle Syverson6-4, 6-1
2023-02-07vs Smyth/Tang 18+ W23Won 10
W#3 DoublesCRAIG STERN / Tim Theisen vs Doug Anderson / Rick Johnston6-3, 6-4
2023-01-24vs Hammargren/Farber 18+ W23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCRAIG STERN / Thomas James vs Timothy Finnerty / Ryan Gebhardt2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Ryan Kadelbach
published
3.83
Ty Shustarich
published
3.82
Tom Shustarich
published
3.77
Thomas James
published
Del Bauers
published 4
Derick Dehmer
published 4
3.74
Tim Theisen
published
3.68
Steve Gramins
published
3.66
CRAIG STERN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Lewis Yang
published
3.38
Earl Williams
published
3.30
Andrew MacArthur
published 3.5
3.20
Scott Lucas
published
Nicholas Fisher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Shustarich + Ty Shustarich6356% games−0.5% vs expected
Tom Shustarich + Thomas James2351% games−1.6% vs expected
Ryan Kadelbach + Steve Gramins31143% games−10.0% vs expected
Ryan Kadelbach + Ty Shustarich4165% gamesnot enough data
Thomas James + Scott Lucas314 matchesnot enough data
Tom Shustarich + Tim Theisen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Kadelbach
24W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
3.98
Ty Shustarich
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Tom Shustarich
20W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
Thomas James
25W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Del Bauers
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Derick Dehmer
8W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Theisen
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
Steve Gramins
20W–31L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
CRAIG STERN
131W–164L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Lewis Yang
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Earl Williams
3W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Andrew MacArthur
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Scott Lucas
16W–39L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Nicholas Fisher
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.