Teams

LA - The P-22s

2023 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-26vs LA - Fremont AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Emma Gardner vs Austin Galliguez / Yonglin Conner7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2023-02-26vs LA - Rancho CienegaLost 01
L#3 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Emma Gardner vs Philip Brooks / Helen Brewer3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-02-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Sherman / Edmond Avedisian vs Andrea Tieng / Jimmy Lee4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-02-05vs LA - MountainGate GatorsWon 10
W#3 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Amy Wax vs Daimon Ghazy / Cindy Shih6-4, 6-2
2023-01-28vs LA - Ladies and the TrampsLost 01
L#2 DoublesSylvia DSouza / Edmond Avedisian vs Julieta Moure / David Li6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2023-01-18vs LA - Queen AnneLost 01
L#3 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Alexandra Kovach vs Kai Shen / Michelle Brantley0-6, 4-6
2023-01-08vs LA - Kiss My AceWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Sara Sherman vs Carter Ashforth / Hai Vu6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Edmond Avedisian
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Audie Leksunthon
published 3.5
3.24
Joy Cho
published
2.93
Alvin Chong
published 3.5
2.92
Sara Sherman
published
2.88
Fariba Navid
published
2.82
Ricardo Gonzalez
published
2.68
Susan Mondt
published
2.44
Andrea Crum
published 3
Gabriel Moffat
published
Meredith Levine
published
Tony Ngo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alvin Chong + Audie Leksunthon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edmond Avedisian
104W–115L career · 7 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Audie Leksunthon
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joy Cho
37W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.24
3.5
Alvin Chong
4W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.93
Sara Sherman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
Fariba Navid
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88
Ricardo Gonzalez
39W–31L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.82
Susan Mondt
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Andrea Crum
1W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
Gabriel Moffat
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meredith Levine
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tony Ngo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.