Teams

SATL40/KLangley/CCS

USTA Combo 40 & Over · Women - 6.5

4 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 14 6:30 PM
The Westside Club
Sep 21 6:30 PM
Country Club Of Spartanburg
Sep 28 6:30 PM
The Westside Club
2026-08-31vs SATLC40/Moore-Barry/YMCALost 01
L#1 DoublesMeghan Teague / Faith Pope vs Amy Eskew / Kristen Welborn6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-24vs SATLC40/Moore-Barry/YMCAWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatherine Langley / Melissa Gerscovich vs Vicky Bagwell / Kelly Birch4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCole Reutter / Hadley Inabinet vs Sandy Scott / TLynn Gilpin6-3, 6-0
2026-08-17vs SATLC40/Moore-Barry/YMCALost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Bass Black / Faith Pope vs Courtney Nix / Leigh Lamb4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHadley Inabinet / Ashley Goodlett vs Natalie Barry / Renee Moore4-6, 3-6
2026-08-10vs SATLC40/Moore-Barry/YMCAWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Malcolm / Melissa Gerscovich vs Vicky Bagwell / Kelly Birch6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFaith Pope / Carolyn Crenshaw vs Karen McBride / Cathy Brinegar7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATL40/KLangley/CCS1133759
2SATLC40/Moore-Barry/YMCA1133753

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Elizabeth Malcolm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Hadley Inabinet
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Katherine Langley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Faith Pope
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hadley Inabinet + Elizabeth Malcolm12067% games+21.4% vs expected
Faith Pope + Elizabeth Malcolm5167% games+18.4% vs expected
Hadley Inabinet + Katherine Langley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Malcolm
57W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Hadley Inabinet
24W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Katherine Langley
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Faith Pope
16W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.