Teams

Jenkins

2022 SUMMER 18&O Mixed · Summer 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-28vs Players ElliottSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrett Stewart / Kelsey Jenkins vs Adrienne Keves / Kyle Bickhart1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTess Tannehill / Dane Poppe vs Emma Russell / Walter Samora6-3, 6-3
2022-07-14vs Players ElliottLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanielle Patton / Nicholas Wortman vs Noah Elliott / Amy Thompson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Budd / Jeremy Budd vs Johaun Cheng / Julie Samora3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Parsons / Jay Parsons vs Kyle Bickhart / Adrienne Keves0-6, 2-6
2022-07-09vs Players ElliottLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelsey Jenkins / Brett Stewart vs Noah Elliott / Leigh Fullenkamp7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDane Poppe / Jessica Bell vs Patrick McColgan / Jennifer Murphy6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJeremy Budd / Karen Budd vs Heath Elliott / Stacy Elliott2-6, 2-6
2022-06-22vs Players ElliottLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Bell / Jermaine Lanier vs Noah Elliott / Amy Thompson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Budd / Jeremy Budd vs Walter Samora / Leigh Fullenkamp0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Parsons / Brent Kirk vs Heath Elliott / Stacy Elliott3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Summer 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Players Elliott40102667
2Jenkins0421020131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Dane Poppe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Karen Budd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Brett Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Nicholas Wortman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Danielle Patton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Angela Parsons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Jay Parsons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Bell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kelsey Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tess Tannehill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Stewart + Kelsey Jenkins5257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dane Poppe
47W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.95
Karen Budd
101W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Brett Stewart
29W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicholas Wortman
31W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
4
Danielle Patton
20W–26L career · 1 line in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.39
3.5
Angela Parsons
71W–111L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Jay Parsons
30W–55L career · 1 line in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Jessica Bell
57W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelsey Jenkins
41W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tess Tannehill
63W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.