Teams

RSchuler/APowers (Longview)

2023 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Women - Sat PM

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-06vs MNee (Sardis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJean Salisbury / Susan Eastman Tilsch vs Jayne May / Bonnie Newell3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Frasier / Mary Russo vs Dale Hall / Monica Nee3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRachael Schuler / Debbie Miller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-29vs LPeterson (OPRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesCynthia Frasier / Mary Russo vs Tracy Brading / Virginia Jenkins3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Riggins / Dora Burdzinska-Drezek vs Jennifer Gardiner / Barbara Salvucci3-6, 4-6
2023-04-17vs LPeterson (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesElena Donaldson / Dora Burdzinska-Drezek vs Amy Adams / Jennifer Gardiner1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Carpenter / Jean Salisbury vs Tracy Brading / Suzy Johnson6-3, 6-4
2023-04-15vs MNee (Sardis)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDora Burdzinska-Drezek / Donna Mangum vs Bonnie Newell / Dorothy Cato7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Ward / Jean Salisbury vs Dale Hall / Marta Schmitt3-6, 0-6
2023-03-25vs MNee (Sardis)Won 21
L#1 DoublesBeth Carpenter / Elena Donaldson vs Lin Su / Dale Hall1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Mangum / Cynthia Frasier vs Sharon Gehrig / Monica Nee6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRachael Schuler / Debbie Miller vs Ruth Shaffner / Dorothy Cato7-5, 6-2
2023-03-18vs LPeterson (OPRC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesAlicia Powers / Jean Salisbury vs Tracy Brading / Virginia Jenkins0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Frasier / Mary Russo vs Arlene Conger / Suzy Johnson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Miller / Rachael Schuler vs Lynn Davis / Amy Adams6-3, 6-4
2023-02-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRachael Schuler / Diane Ward vs Amy Adams / Leslie Peterson3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Women - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Mary Malhame
published 4.5
4.30
Cynthia Frasier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Beth Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Debbie Miller
published 4.5
4.01
Elena Donaldson
published 4
3.98
Diane Ward
published 4
3.97
Jean Salisbury
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Lisa Riggins
published
3.82
Rachael Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 4
3.82
Dora Burdzinska-Drezek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Rosie Rogers
published
Donna Mangum
published
Mary Russo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Carpenter + Jean Salisbury3443% gamesnot enough data
Elena Donaldson + Rachael Schuler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Mary Malhame
48W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Cynthia Frasier
48W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Beth Carpenter
22W–28L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Debbie Miller
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Elena Donaldson
50W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Diane Ward
58W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
Jean Salisbury
7W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.97
Lisa Riggins
37W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Rachael Schuler
298W–157L career · 11 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Dora Burdzinska-Drezek
50W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
Rosie Rogers
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.78
Donna Mangum
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Russo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Eastman Tilsch
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.