Teams

BC-Kramer/TanyaDrawer

2025 MIXED 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Mixed 18 & Over - 8.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.89 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Mixed 18 & Over - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Brian Beach
published 4.5
4.10
Carly Capper
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
4.06
Kevin Escobar
published
3.99
Michelle Tangeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Melanie Archer
published
3.80
Danielle Raymond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.78
Brian Raymond
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Amanda McCarthy
published 4
3.58
Jennifer Giordano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Tanya Drawer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Christian Capper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Gemma Lokier
published
3.25
Colleen Post
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Estuardo Meza
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Jillian Panasewicz
published
3.12
Martha Zane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marcus Lokier
published
Nicholas Starinieri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nick Palmieri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Post + Estuardo Meza5259% games+12.8% vs expected
Brian Raymond + Michelle Tangeman10264% games+11.6% vs expected
Brian Raymond + Carly Capper12068% games+8.6% vs expected
Nicholas Starinieri + Carly Capper404 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Raymond + Christian Capper134 matchesnot enough data
Nicholas Starinieri + Michelle Tangeman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Beach
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.14
4
Carly Capper
85W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
4.10
Kevin Escobar
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Michelle Tangeman
47W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
Melanie Archer
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.97
3.5
Danielle Raymond
45W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.80
4
Brian Raymond
68W–38L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Amanda McCarthy
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Jennifer Giordano
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Tanya Drawer
106W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Christian Capper
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Gemma Lokier
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Colleen Post
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Estuardo Meza
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Jillian Panasewicz
17W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Martha Zane
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Marcus Lokier
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicholas Starinieri
61W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nick Palmieri
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.