Teams

KY/LOU/MENTING/ROBINSON

2025 USTA COMBO 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-21vs KY/LOU/STEEN/MEAGHERSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMichelle Menting / Margy Stivers vs Stephanie Kellerman / Michelle Winebrenner6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Rassiga / Lea Marsh vs Lilly Massa-McKinley / Stephanie Saxton1-6, 4-6
2025-09-07vs KY/LOU/FOUNTAINLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Menting / Karen Griffin vs Mary Kate Shain / Amanda Penn1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Culver / Gayle Ciliberti vs Morgan Robertson / Lindsay Brown3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSara Robinson / Beth Tinsley vs Cheryl Fox / Marilyn Croak2-6, 5-7
2025-08-24vs KY/LOU/AGIN/MCGLONEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Greenrose / Nancy Jones vs Lilly McGlone / Adrienne Polen6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHaley Smith / Gayle Ciliberti vs Katie Hockensmith / Brooke Bloch6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSara Robinson / Kim DeVries vs Joanna Agin / Brooke Ault6-1, 6-4
2025-08-10vs KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLDSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJulie Mcdonnell / Nancy Jones vs Mandy Yackey / Mary Jennings7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHaley Smith / Gayle Ciliberti vs Kelley Roberts / Keeley Parker7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-02vs KY/LOU/WILSONLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Culver / Gayle Ciliberti vs Sarah Wilson / Kristie Daugherty5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLea Marsh / Kim Greenrose vs Robbyn McClain / Katie Rush6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHaley Smith / Michelle Heuser vs Carrie Merrill / Lindsey Brodsky4-6, 3-6
2025-07-27vs KY/LOU/WINDHORSTWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rassiga / Lea Marsh vs Katie Cropper / Nicole Boehm6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHaley Smith / Irina McGrath vs Christine Sillings / Martha Hudson7-5, 7-5
2025-07-19vs KY/LOU/DALTON/POLTERSplit 11
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Stone / Gayle Ciliberti vs Katherine Louis / Kim Johnson6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHaley Smith / Beth Tinsley vs Kimberly Polter / Karen Weathers5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Michelle Menting
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Kim Greenrose
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Jennifer Rassiga
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Mary Culver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Beth Tinsley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Margy Stivers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Gayle Ciliberti
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.73
Lea Marsh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Kim DeVries
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Irina McGrath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Mcdonnell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Heuser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margy Stivers + Gayle Ciliberti314 matchesnot enough data
Kim DeVries + Lea Marsh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Menting
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Kim Greenrose
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jennifer Rassiga
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Mary Culver
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
3
Beth Tinsley
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Margy Stivers
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Gayle Ciliberti
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.75
Lea Marsh
8W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Kim DeVries
6W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Irina McGrath
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Julie Mcdonnell
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Heuser
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.