Teams

A55 7.0M AO Messina

2022 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-21vs A55 7.0M SP MoneysmithLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteven Mabe / Paul Hansen vs Thomas Chi / Donald Fisher6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Reese / Mark Knapp vs Pete Goumas / Baruch Sontag3-6, 0-6
2022-07-14vs A55 7.0M TP BassakLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Mabe / Mark Knapp vs James Schulte / Patrick Renz3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-30vs A55 7.0M PW LongoriaLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Richardson / Steven Mabe vs Michael Crider / Ron Smith2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Hansen / Paul Sutor vs Steve Poe / Jeffrey Schubert1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick McIntyre / Brian Reese vs Antony D'Avino / Thomas Campanella2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-23vs A55 7.0M MV1 FalconeLost 12
L#1 DoublesSanjay Beach / Steven Mabe vs Mark Atkinson / Earl Poptic4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick McIntyre / Paul Hansen vs Ken Gustafson / Michael Falcone1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Reese / Robert Richardson vs Garnett Meador / Thomas Strauchon6-2, 6-1
2022-06-16vs A55 7.0M PM ReedWon 21
W#1 DoublesSanjay Beach / Christopher Messina vs Paul Boland / Kirk Seablom6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPaul Hansen / Paul Sutor vs Michael Nickley / Ben Zagorski4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Richardson / Brian Reese vs MICHAEL REED / Steve Pennington6-4, 7-5
2022-06-09vs A55 7.0M MV2 RomanWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristopher Messina / Sanjay Beach vs DANIEL CHEN / Brian Ross4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Hansen / Paul Sutor vs Mike Baird / Frank Mercuri6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Richardson / Patrick McIntyre vs Robert Glaser / Gary Bash7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-02vs A55 7.0M LT CrawfordLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Moore / Nick Haas vs Murali Shanker / Steve Gehring5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Hansen / Paul Sutor vs Jeff Wenstrup / John Parry0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSteven Mabe / Patrick McIntyre vs Ronald Thomas / Gene Funk3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-19vs A55 7.0M CV GrossmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Moore / Nick Haas vs Terry Medlar / William Seelbach7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Hansen / Steven Mabe vs Steve Kinnett / James Duber0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMark Knapp / Patrick McIntyre vs Bob Grossman / Egon Singerman1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A55 7.0M MV1 Falcone8019516201
2A55 7.0M LT Crawford6217720184
3A55 7.0M PW Longoria5315922177
4A55 7.0M CV Grossman5315925212
5A55 7.0M TP Bassak4491532226
6A55 7.0M MV2 Roman35131125195
7A55 7.0M SP Moneysmith35111330227
8A55 7.0M AO Messina2661838263
9A55 7.0M PM Reed0832142274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Sanjay Beach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Paul Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
2.94
Christopher Messina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.76
Robert Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Paul Sutor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Knapp
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nick Haas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick McIntyre
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Steven Mabe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Messina + Paul Sutor4845% games+4.3% vs expected
Robert Richardson + Patrick McIntyre5747% games+1.2% vs expected
Paul Sutor + Paul Hansen11135% games−4.7% vs expected
Paul Hansen + Patrick McIntyre1937% games−6.3% vs expected
Paul Sutor + Patrick McIntyre2641% games−11.8% vs expected
Steven Mabe + Paul Sutor1737% games−13.8% vs expected
Christopher Messina + Paul Hansen11133% games−15.9% vs expected
Robert Richardson + Paul Sutor2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sanjay Beach
84W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Paul Hansen
46W–74L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Christopher Messina
26W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.94
Robert Richardson
30W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Paul Sutor
28W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
Mark Knapp
12W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nick Haas
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patrick McIntyre
21W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Mabe
8W–28L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.