Teams

GJTC JPAREGIEN

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - WS · MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - WS

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-29vs GJTC KKILLIANWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Plett / Jimmy Renfroe vs Lorenz Ramseyer / Keith Killian6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCraig Smith / Christopher Cutsforth vs Curt Hansen / Dan Oliver6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJim Paregien / Rodney Sharp vs Biff Messinger / Lee Smith6-4, 6-1
2023-06-22vs GJTC JWENDTWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristopher Cutsforth / Richard Plett vs Donald Ligrani / Dan Birch6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Pacini / Craig Smith vs Richard Arata / Jeff Thornton6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBill Palmer / Steve Watson vs Keith Decker / Wayne Smith1-6, 3-6
2023-06-19vs GJTC KKILLIANWon 30
W#1 DoublesJimmy Renfroe / Christopher Cutsforth vs Curt Hansen / Dan Oliver6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJim Paregien / David Pacini vs Keith Killian / James Corbett7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBill Palmer / Steve Watson vs Kriss Burwell / Lee Smith6-3, 6-3
2023-06-14vs GJTC JWENDTWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Cutsforth / Mike Mahoney vs Keith Decker / Donald Ligrani6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Plett / Jim Paregien vs Randy Majors / Alan MacH3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Smith / Rodney Sharp vs Thad Scholl / Wayne Smith7-6, 7-5
2023-06-07vs GJTC KKILLIANWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Plett / Mike Mahoney vs Lorenz Ramseyer / Curt Hansen6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSteve Watson / Bill Palmer vs James Corbett / Keith Killian4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Kohls / Christopher Cutsforth vs Kriss Burwell / Dan Oliver6-0, 6-2
2023-06-01vs GJTC JWENDTLost 03
L#1 DoublesCraig Smith / Mike Mahoney vs Donald Ligrani / Keith Decker5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJimmy Renfroe / David Pacini vs Richard Arata / Jeff Thornton5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSteve Watson / Bill Palmer vs Thad Scholl / Stan Scott3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-05-25vs GJTC KKILLIANWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Plett / Jimmy Renfroe vs Keith Killian / Curt Hansen6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Kohls / David Pacini vs James Corbett / Biff Messinger6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJim Paregien / Rodney Sharp vs Dan Terrell / Kriss Burwell7-6, 6-4
2023-05-24vs GJTC JWENDTLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Pacini / Richard Plett vs Keith Decker / Donald Ligrani1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCraig Smith / Rodney Sharp vs Mathew Dokoupil / Jeff Thornton6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Kohls / Jimmy Renfroe vs Richard Arata / Stan Scott2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - WS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GJTC JWENDT6217717168
2GJTC JPAREGIEN6216819194
3GJTC KKILLIAN0832142272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Richard Plett
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Bill Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Christopher Cutsforth
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
John Kohls
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
David Pacini
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Jimmy Renfroe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jim Paregien
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mike Mahoney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rodney Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Pacini + Jim Paregien4167% games+13.4% vs expected
David Pacini + John Kohls51144% games−4.5% vs expected
David Pacini + Richard Plett3353% gamesnot enough data
David Pacini + Jimmy Renfroe0533% gamesnot enough data
Jimmy Renfroe + Jim Paregien4163% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Cutsforth + Mike Mahoney5060% gamesnot enough data
Jimmy Renfroe + Richard Plett314 matchesnot enough data
John Kohls + Richard Plett404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Richard Plett
161W–68L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Bill Palmer
15W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christopher Cutsforth
40W–18L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
John Kohls
55W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
David Pacini
80W–113L career · 5 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jimmy Renfroe
31W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
Jim Paregien
21W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Mahoney
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rodney Sharp
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.