Teams

PVIC - Cleek

2026 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Summer · 7.5 W Saturday

17 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-30vs Boone - ThiagarajanLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Parker / Amanda Newman vs Polly Curole / Jenni Westbrook1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Walling / Kelly Burnett vs Faye Woods / Traunia Senior0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Cleek / Sheila Rice vs Maria Dekar / Amanda Swearingen1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-08-29vs Jax Beach - HallLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeah Baggs / Elizabeth Paul vs Emily Pierson / Elizabeth Kerian5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Cara Akers vs Leonor Padula / Beth Kane7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmanda Walling / Stephanie Freeman vs Katie Milligan / Rina Rosada1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-22vs Sawgrass - PellaLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Cleek / Elizabeth Paul vs Leslie McClure / Laura Player5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeah Baggs / Tracy Streva vs Kristin Bossart / Darlene Deo1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSheila Rice / Jenny Meide vs Christina Felsing / Kim Gibson5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-08vs Marsh Landing - FontaineWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Freeman / Stephanie Mock vs Anna Neal / Kara Lenz6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Heidi McLeod vs Sherri Ouchi / Moira Wallace7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Cleek / Kathy DeJesus vs Susan Fontaine / Susan Marie Thornton HOLLIDAY1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-01vs Sawgrass - PellaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Cleek / Stephanie Freeman vs Lisa Martell / Lorrayne Carless7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephanie Mock / Tracy Streva vs Isabella Toby / Leslie McClure7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-18vs Timuquana - LovelaceLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Freeman / Jenny Meide vs Elizabeth Lovelace / Margaret Moore2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJan Alley / Jacqueline Bell Egan vs Katherine Kidd / Jessica Ryals4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Ross / Andrea Kaelin vs Raymur Rachels / Ginger Hodge7-6, 6-0
2026-07-11vs Jax Beach - HallWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Freeman / Jenny Meide vs Emily Pierson / Ali Hall7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Andrea Kaelin vs Natasha Senchuk / Rosemarie Prokop3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Ross / Cara Akers vs Danijela Pope / Katie Milligan7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 7.5 W Saturday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sawgrass - Pella419617128
2Timuquana - Lovelace318410106
3Boone - Thiagarajan227512111
4PVIC - Cleek227513123
5Jax Beach - Hall135714114
6Marsh Landing - Fontaine1431225165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Julie van Voorhis
published
3.87
Elizabeth Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Jacqueline Bell Egan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Jennifer Cleek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Kathy Parker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Stephanie Mock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Amanda Walling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Leah Baggs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Elizabeth Paul
published
3.53
Jenny Meide
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Heidi McLeod
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Jan Alley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Stephanie Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Andrea Kaelin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Kathy DeJesus
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Sheila Rice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tracy Streva
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Bell Egan + Julie van Voorhis5063% games+4.0% vs expected
Jennifer Cleek + Stephanie Freeman314 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Mock + Stephanie Freeman404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie van Voorhis
45W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.89
Elizabeth Ross
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Jacqueline Bell Egan
145W–100L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.81
Jennifer Cleek
18W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Kathy Parker
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Stephanie Mock
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Amanda Walling
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
Leah Baggs
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Elizabeth Paul
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.57
Jenny Meide
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Heidi McLeod
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Jan Alley
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Stephanie Freeman
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Andrea Kaelin
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Kathy DeJesus
17W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
Sheila Rice
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tracy Streva
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.