Teams

2.5W Gray

2024 Team Singles Tournament-NE · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-02-25vs 2.5W HamrickLost 03
L#1 SinglesNoel Orr vs Erinn Grady6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLauren Zuelzke vs Katie Boykin6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAjah Sawyer vs Delanie Williams5-7, 2-6
2024-02-24vs 2.5W FulghumLost 12
W#1 SinglesLauren Huckaby vs Susan Hand-Pina6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAlicia Milstead vs Ashton Scarborough0-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesAjah Sawyer vs Tara Williams5-7, 1-6
2024-02-24vs 2.5W DownsLost 03
L#1 SinglesApril Gray vs Houstyn Loosier0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesNoel Orr vs Marin Touchstone6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLauren Zuelzke vs Christine Ohrberg3-6, 2-6
2024-02-23vs 2.5W GarnerLost 12
L#1 SinglesLauren Huckaby vs Lauren Person1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesApril Gray vs Ruth Potter6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesAlicia Milstead vs Martha Hall3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12.5W Garner3193870
22.5W Downs317513102
32.5W Fulghum22661399
42.5W Hamrick226616126
52.5W Gray0421020120

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
April Gray
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.70
Lauren Huckaby
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.59
Lauren Zuelzke
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.58
Alicia Milstead
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Ajah Sawyer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Noel Orr
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Milstead + April Gray7454% games+5.5% vs expected
Lauren Huckaby + April Gray123 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Zuelzke + Alicia Milstead123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
April Gray
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Lauren Huckaby
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.70
Lauren Zuelzke
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Alicia Milstead
34W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
2.5
Ajah Sawyer
19W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Noel Orr
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.