Teams

BROADSTONE RC CW7.5B

2023 COMBO · Women 7.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-10-19vs JOHNSON RANCH CW7.5BLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Andres / Kaprece Walker vs Kathy Joachim / Jane van Loon1-6, 3-6
2023-09-28vs LAGUNA CREEK CW7.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesElaine Masters Brilhart / Kaprece Walker vs Lyn Wilson / Amy Dai1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Xuan Li
published
3.85
Kelsi Cory
published
Dawn Perkins
published 4
3.68
May Bhetraratana
published
3.65
Kim Kelsey
published
3.63
Linda Mcclain
published
3.60
Teresa Jansson
published
3.55
Paige Farrell
published
3.50
Pamela Browneller
published
3.33
Kaprece Walker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Lisa Martucci-Gibbs
published
3.24
Christina Charn
published 3.5
3.21
Carolyn Soriano
published 3.5
3.19
Sandi Ammons
published
3.18
Jeanne Ferrell
published
3.16
Denise Chisick
published 3.5
3.12
Betty Williams
published 3.5
3.11
Maggie Mei Choy
published
2.99
Leigh McNeely
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandi Ammons + Lisa Martucci-Gibbs2350% gamesnot enough data
Jeanne Ferrell + Sandi Ammons213 matchesnot enough data
Paige Farrell + Elaine Masters Brilhart033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Xuan Li
45W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.99
Kelsi Cory
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Dawn Perkins
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
May Bhetraratana
22W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.68
Kim Kelsey
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Linda Mcclain
32W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.63
Teresa Jansson
7W–18L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.60
4
Elaine Masters Brilhart
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Paige Farrell
4W–25L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
Pamela Browneller
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Kaprece Walker
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Lisa Martucci-Gibbs
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Christina Charn
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Carolyn Soriano
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Sandi Ammons
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Jeanne Ferrell
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Denise Chisick
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Betty Williams
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
Maggie Mei Choy
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Leigh McNeely
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.