Teams

BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Datsko

2021 NCT Adult 18 & Over Men · 5.0 Adult Men 1

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-05-08vs SIMS:BowersLost 01
L#1 DoublesRostyk Datsko / Andrew Salak vs Fahoum Fahoum / Holden Robinson6-4, 2-6, 6-4
2021-05-01vs NewEngland/Sucoll/Adult18&Over5.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Salak / Matt Dean vs Brook Hazelton / Jason Sucoll6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJeff White vs Mark Kahan1-6, 1-6
2021-03-21vs NewEngland/Sucoll/Adult18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Salak / Matt Dean vs Dustin Parente / Alex Romaine4-6, 6-3, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeff White / Juan Pablo Gutierrez vs Jason Sucoll / John Holschlag2-6, 6-7
2021-03-06vs NewEngland/Sucoll/Adult18&Over5.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatt Dean / Andrew Salak vs Jason Sucoll / Brook Hazelton6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRostyk Datsko / Jeff White vs John Holschlag / Peter Appleton4-6, 6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.0 Adult Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NewEngland/Sucoll/Adult18&Over5.0M5113515151
2BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Datsko329614143
3SIMS:Bowers0521327188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Andrew Salak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.32
Christopher Barnhart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.32
Rostyk Datsko
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.96
Jeff White
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
John Megas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Barnhart + John Megas8749% games−3.4% vs expected
Rostyk Datsko + Christopher Barnhart303 matchesnot enough data
Rostyk Datsko + John Megas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Salak
13W–14L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
4.52
4.5
Christopher Barnhart
17W–11L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
4.32
Rostyk Datsko
85W–44L career · 10 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
4.32
Jeff White
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.96
John Megas
12W–9L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Juan Pablo Gutierrez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.