Teams

JTC-Clarke-The Jupiter Edge

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-10vs GTC-BolingWon 31
W#1 DoublesLuke Williams / Paul Hutchins vs Igor Kunitsa / Bill Fahey6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesOscar Grados vs Mark Weiser6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCraig Keighron / Oliver Vicente vs Steve Cowger / Robert Mattson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTor Hagen / Stefan Muehleis vs Don White / Al Boling6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-03vs STACers-WatsonLost 13
L#1 DoublesLuke Williams / Paul Hutchins vs Dave Ketchum / DaeGoon Lee1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesOscar Grados vs Peter Watson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesOliver Vicente / Bryce Clarke vs Jim Clerget / Timothy Martin4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRobert Rice / Jason Morgan vs Jerry Saul / Marty Merriott6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2021-03-28vs STACers-WatsonLost 13
W#1 DoublesDavid White / Craig Keighron vs Dave Ketchum / DaeGoon Lee5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJason Morgan vs Peter Watson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBryce Clarke / Philip Pinkstaff vs Jim Clerget / Michael Davis6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesOscar Grados / Tor Hagen vs Christopher Grippo / Rob Kirkwood4-6, 7-6
2021-03-21vs KTAC-Turner/BoyettLost 13
L#1 DoublesBryce Clarke / Oliver Vicente vs Bruce Bennett / Greg Gaskey5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesDavid White vs Ken Ahlstrom6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPhilip Pinkstaff / Stefan Muehleis vs Bill Boyett / William McKenna4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Rice / Jason Morgan vs Eric Moe / Chris Barron3-6, 2-6
2021-03-14vs LRC-VennemanWon 31
W#1 DoublesLuke Williams / Paul Hutchins vs Jeff Walz / Terry Wright6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesOscar Grados vs Adrian Florea6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Rice / Tor Hagen vs Clemente Villalobos / Oscar Tanhueco6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJason Morgan / David White vs Jeff Laskowski / Ken Enslow6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2021-03-05vs GTC-BolingLost 13
W#1 DoublesPaul Hutchins / Luke Williams vs Marcello Mancini / Al Boling6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDavid White vs Jeremy Pawloski1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Keighron / Bryce Clarke vs Bill Fahey / Don White3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesOliver Vicente / Philip Pinkstaff vs William Parker / Mark Weiser3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KTAC-Turner/Boyett0615918195
2STACers-Watson06141026217
3GTC-Boling06131129220
4JTC-Clarke-The Jupiter Edge06101431230
5LRC-Venneman0681633251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David White
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Oliver Vicente
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.28
Luke Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Paul Hutchins
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.24
Robert Rice
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Craig Keighron
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Bryce Clarke
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Oscar Grados
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Frank Parker
published 0
Jason Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Philip Pinkstaff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
Stefan Muehleis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tor Hagen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luke Williams + Paul Hutchins171452% games+3.5% vs expected
Bryce Clarke + Oliver Vicente3746% games−0.8% vs expected
Stefan Muehleis + Bryce Clarke0623% gamesnot enough data
Philip Pinkstaff + Bryce Clarke033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David White
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Oliver Vicente
206W–80L career · 4 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Luke Williams
51W–43L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Paul Hutchins
28W–27L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Robert Rice
15W–38L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Craig Keighron
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Bryce Clarke
57W–96L career · 4 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Oscar Grados
56W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.85
0
Frank Parker
11W–27L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jason Morgan
6W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Philip Pinkstaff
13W–40L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stefan Muehleis
5W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tor Hagen
2W–19L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.