Teams

Reich - Acac

2025 Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-21vs Grant - Keswick Net NinjasWon 10
W#2 DoublesEsther Bausserman / Christopher Raupp vs Lindy Kastendike / Randall Lemoine6-2, 6-1
2025-06-16vs Grant - Keswick Net NinjasWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Sawyer / Leah Burger vs Susan Tracy / Josh Tracy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Kortmulder / Tara Ford vs Jessica Johnson / Theodore Papaspyridis5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Wunderlich / Susan Wunderlich vs Emily Granville / Adam Im5-7, 4-6
2025-06-14vs Grant - Keswick Net NinjasWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristopher Raupp / Judith Ely vs Bradley Geist / Emily Granville6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTom Ward / Maren Ward vs Tuan Tran / Amanda Tran6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Maren Ward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Christopher Raupp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Christina Meyer
published 3
2.86
Richard Sawyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Esther Bausserman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Tara Ford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Judith Ely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Leah Burger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Tom Ward
published
John Kortmulder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Wunderlich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maren Ward + Tom Ward6257% gamesnot enough data
Judith Ely + Christopher Raupp123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Maren Ward
98W–67L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
3
Christopher Raupp
32W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Christina Meyer
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Richard Sawyer
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Esther Bausserman
108W–161L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Tara Ford
20W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Judith Ely
61W–103L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Leah Burger
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Tom Ward
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
2.61
John Kortmulder
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Wunderlich
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.