Teams

Chestnut Ridge Sweet Spots

2022 40&Over Women · 5.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.75 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-13vs Rye Racquet Club: BodeLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoi Musikar / Irina Zaretsky vs Chiara Ciabatti / Joy Cummiskey6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Friedlaender / Kathy McMahon vs Roopali Hall / Charlotte Stainer1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Kaminsky / Margaret Randazzo vs Eugenia Kovalev / Ally Shaule6-1, 6-1
2022-06-15vs Rye Racquet Club: BodeLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy McMahon / Susan Friedlaender vs Corinna Bode / Eugenia Kovalev7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Kaminsky / Margaret Randazzo vs Roopali Hall / Ally Shaule2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCourtney James / Irina Zaretsky vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-01vs Rye Racquet Club: BodeLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoi Musikar / Jennifer Schnitzer vs Carolina Torres / Chiara Ciabatti3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Gill / Susan Kaminsky vs Andrea Mueffelmann / Michaela Wey3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCinta Delmonaco-Kemp / Leticia Fantauzzi vs Corinna Bode / Eugenia Kovalev3-6, 3-6
2022-05-11vs Rye Racquet Club: BodeLost 12
W#1 DoublesOlga Harvey / Karin Weiner vs Corinna Bode / Mutsumi Shirai7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLeticia Fantauzzi / Cinta Delmonaco-Kemp vs Andrea Mueffelmann / Carolina Bernal1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Friedlaender / Kathy McMahon vs Ally Shaule / Chiara Ciabatti1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rye Racquet Club: Bode0493885
2Chestnut Ridge Sweet Spots043918115

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Irina Zaretsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.61
Olga Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.61
Margaret Randazzo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.57
Susan Kaminsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.50
Karin Weiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Sara Pomerantz
published
4.28
Karen Gill
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.19
Jennifer Schnitzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Joi Musikar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Kathy McMahon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Cinta Delmonaco-Kemp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Courtney James
published
Leticia Fantauzzi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Friedlaender
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karin Weiner + Olga Harvey4258% games+10.7% vs expected
Jennifer Schnitzer + Susan Friedlaender3350% games−1.8% vs expected
Kathy McMahon + Susan Friedlaender2638% games−8.8% vs expected
Susan Kaminsky + Margaret Randazzo3265% gamesnot enough data
Leticia Fantauzzi + Cinta Delmonaco-Kemp134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Schnitzer + Karen Gill224 matchesnot enough data
Joi Musikar + Margaret Randazzo033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Schnitzer + Olga Harvey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Irina Zaretsky
7W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.80
Olga Harvey
42W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.61
Margaret Randazzo
24W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.61
Susan Kaminsky
44W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
4.57
Karin Weiner
58W–56L career · 1 line in 2022
51%49%<1%
4.50
Sara Pomerantz
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
4.33
Karen Gill
110W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.28
Jennifer Schnitzer
21W–42L career · 1 line in 2022
8%92%1%
4.19
Joi Musikar
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
4.18
Kathy McMahon
22W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
Cinta Delmonaco-Kemp
57W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.94
Courtney James
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leticia Fantauzzi
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Friedlaender
21W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.