Teams

SLKBI-Bienstock/Edgemoor Park

Lake USTA 40 & Over Summer Singles · 4.0 Women 40+ Singles

6 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-03Won 20
W#1 SinglesLinda Radovich vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAbbi Troutman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-30vs SLKSE-Senff/Peninsula_singlesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLinda Radovich vs Elizabeth Foreman6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKristine Bienstock vs Erin Hallman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-29vs SLKSE-Senff/Peninsula_singlesWon 21
L#1 SinglesAbbi Troutman vs Tracie Persinger1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKristine Bienstock vs Wendy Massarelli6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJana Ritter vs Alicia Bowman6-2, 6-2
2026-07-28vs SLKSE-Senff/Peninsula_singlesWon 20
W#1 SinglesLane Wallace vs Kira Skill7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJana Ritter vs Danielle Mikolajczyk7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-16vs SLKSE-Senff/Peninsula_singlesLost 02
L#1 SinglesLane Wallace vs Elizabeth Foreman6-7, 6-7
L#3 SinglesAbbi Troutman vs Alicia Bowman1-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs SLKSE-Senff/Peninsula_singlesWon 20
W#1 SinglesLane Wallace vs Kira Skill7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKristine Bienstock vs Danielle Mikolajczyk6-2, 6-1
2026-06-18vs SLKSE-Senff/Peninsula_singlesWon 21
W#1 SinglesLinda Radovich vs Tracie Persinger6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLane Wallace vs Erin Hallman6-3, 7-5
L#3 SinglesKristine Bienstock vs Alicia Bowman4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-04vs SLKSE-Senff/Peninsula_singlesWon 20
W#2 SinglesJana Ritter vs Danielle Mikolajczyk7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesPALOMA LOPEZ vs Kim Kelly Senff6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Women 40+ Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SLKBI-Bienstock/Edgemoor Park6216819191
2SLKSE-Senff/Peninsula_singles2681634249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Linda Radovich
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Lane Wallace
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.62
Kristine Bienstock
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.60
Jana Ritter
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
PALOMA LOPEZ
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.22
Abbi Troutman
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Linda Radovich
85W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Lane Wallace
61W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Kristine Bienstock
62W–70L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Jana Ritter
109W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.60
PALOMA LOPEZ
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Abbi Troutman
26W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.