Teams

Edwards/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 4.0 Women 18 & over

16 players · average NTRP 4.14 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Hattie Rounder
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Ana Yambrek
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Alison Rice
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.94
Isabel Xu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.88
Jennifer Sammons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Josie Hammons
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Ragan Washburn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Christina Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Stephanie Sheahan
published
3.66
E'Lane Williams
published 4
3.64
Katie Savage
published
3.61
Kristen Griffith
published
3.48
3.45
Suzanne Sexton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leigh Ann Wills
published
Stephanie Upshaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Sheahan + Ragan Washburn4265% games+7.9% vs expected
Stephanie Upshaw + Jennifer Sammons10652% games+5.0% vs expected
Christina Edwards + Stephanie Sheahan2546% games+2.1% vs expected
Ragan Washburn + Josie Hammons12758% games+1.8% vs expected
Suzanne Sexton + Isabel Xu12655% games+1.6% vs expected
Brooke Parker Justice + E'Lane Williams13559% games+1.3% vs expected
Isabel Xu + Ana Yambrek8166% games−1.2% vs expected
Isabel Xu + Jennifer Sammons4258% games−1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hattie Rounder
43W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Ana Yambrek
37W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Alison Rice
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Isabel Xu
51W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Jennifer Sammons
37W–24L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.88
Josie Hammons
44W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.86
Ragan Washburn
28W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Christina Edwards
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Stephanie Sheahan
19W–23L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
E'Lane Williams
45W–17L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
Katie Savage
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Kristen Griffith
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Brooke Parker Justice
36W–20L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Suzanne Sexton
22W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Leigh Ann Wills
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Upshaw
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.