Teams

PC Triple F Gals - J. Wyckoff

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-19vs Palma Ceia Penn Pirates - N. GomezLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Leary / Julianna Holbrook vs Erin Annis / Shelby Tuttle0-6, 2-6
2025-04-21Won 10
W#4 DoublesJulianna Holbrook / Sheila Brown vs Amanda Smith / Kerri Brown6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-14vs Hills/Parmer/40&Over3.0WLost 01
L#4 DoublesJayme Kosar / Kimberly Kurey vs Jennifer O'malley / Katie Christianson4-6, 1-6
2025-04-07vs Buckhorn Matchmakers - C. SullivanLost 01
L#4 DoublesKaren Leary / Julianna Holbrook vs Andrea Stuart / Jackie Lindemulder3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Amy Flaherty
published 3
2.78
Christine Assefa
published 3
2.76
Jo Morton
published
2.73
Kimberly Kurey
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Melissa Foster
published
2.65
Karen Leary
published
2.57
Julie Goodwin
published
2.55
Patricia Smith
published
2.55
Stacey McCastlain
published
2.55
Sheila Brown
published
2.55
Jackie Wyckoff
published 3
2.49
Sheila Calistri
published
2.47
Jayme Kosar
published
2.47
Lauren Lelewski
published
2.38
Susan Rind
published
2.37
Julianna Holbrook
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jayme Kosar + Karen Leary2345% games−0.6% vs expected
Jackie Wyckoff + Julie Goodwin11035% games−6.9% vs expected
Julianna Holbrook + Susan Rind134 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Smith + Susan Rind033 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Lelewski + Sheila Calistri123 matchesnot enough data
Jayme Kosar + Sheila Calistri213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Flaherty
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Christine Assefa
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Jo Morton
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.76
3
Kimberly Kurey
21W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Melissa Foster
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Karen Leary
8W–20L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Julie Goodwin
6W–21L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.57
Patricia Smith
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.55
Stacey McCastlain
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Sheila Brown
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Jackie Wyckoff
8W–17L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Sheila Calistri
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
Jayme Kosar
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
Lauren Lelewski
3W–14L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
Susan Rind
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Julianna Holbrook
60W–151L career · 3 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.