Teams

Raintree Martin

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-16vs ACAC Callaghan / BartholomewWon 10
W#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Rosita Torres6-1, 7-5
2022-06-15vs HCC StinsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Morris / Crystal May vs Beth Stinson / Amery Whitby4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesShannon Webb vs Vanessa Jones6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-10vs Twin Hickory YuLost 01
L#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Uma Maheswari Subramaniam1-6, 1-6
2022-06-08vs Southhampton LockhartLost 01
L#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Deena Kretzer2-6, 1-6
2022-06-03vs Westwood AnthonyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Morris / Shannon Webb vs Becky Anthony / Holley Nilson6-4, 6-3
2022-06-01vs SCC CacciottiLost 01
L#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Sara Manners2-6, 1-6
2022-05-27vs CCV WilliamsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCrystal May / Jennifer Morris vs Christine Longood / Mary Nesbitt6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Windy Campbell6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-20vs HCC StinsonLost 01
L#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Amery Whitby6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Crystal May
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Lisa Harmon
published
3.25
Suzanne Martin
published
3.23
Corrine Cooper
published 3.5
3.22
Bridget Westhoven
published 3.5
3.17
Karen Solana
published
3.10
Shannon Webb
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
3.02
Donna Moody
published 3.5
Karen Wood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Webb + Suzanne Martin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Crystal May
243W–91L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Lisa Harmon
16W–6L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Suzanne Martin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Corrine Cooper
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Bridget Westhoven
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Karen Solana
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Shannon Webb
112W–98L career · 11 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Donna Moody
3W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
Karen Wood
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.