Teams

YoungA/Chattanooga

2025 Combo 40 & Over-Chattanooga · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-29vs SkinnerLost 12
W#1 DoublesRachel Adams / Melissa Shipp vs Kimberly Rogg / Shirley Kile6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLora Baker / Emily Bagley vs Annie Adams / Heather Tuttle3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMichelle O'Neil / Susan Hoops-whitlock vs Criss Skinner / Camille Burkley-Wilson0-6, 1-6
2025-09-22vs SkinnerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRachel Adams / Melissa Shipp vs Jody Jackson / Heather Tuttle3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Benton / Michelle O'Neil vs Courtney Andreach / Kimberly Rogg2-6, 1-6
2025-09-20vs Palisoc/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesPam Womack / Linda Benton vs Roxie Trovato / Lynne Barkeloo0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCissy Hamlin / Susan Hoops-whitlock vs Cecily Haught / Betsy Wilson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesApril Chambers / Michelle O'Neil vs Cathy Palisoc / Sarah Delay0-6, 0-6
2025-09-15vs Young/ChattanoogaLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelissa Shipp / Rachel Adams vs Amy Weeks / Suzan House6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLora Baker / Carol Hoops vs Carol Tigar / Sharel Hooper2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Bagley / Michelle O'Neil vs Sandra Sadler / Leslie Simmons0-6, 2-6
2025-09-07vs Young/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesHannah Davis / Cissy Hamlin vs Amy Arrowsmith / Leslie Simmons0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Hoops / Lora Baker vs Lisa Govan / Suzan House4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesApril Chambers / Susan Hoops-whitlock vs Lucynda Cynda Holmes / Coleen Davis0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Skinner2471122156
2YoungA/Chattanooga0631531202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Melissa Shipp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Emily Bagley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Anthea Young
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Pam Womack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Hoops
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cissy Hamlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
April Chambers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Linda Benton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lora Baker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Hoops-whitlock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Benton + Pam Womack314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Shipp
23W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70
3.5
Emily Bagley
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Anthea Young
10W–11L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Pam Womack
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Carol Hoops
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cissy Hamlin
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
April Chambers
22W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Linda Benton
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lora Baker
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Hoops-whitlock
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.