Teams

JSteyl (OPRC)

2023 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 8.5 Women - Sat PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-30vs AConger (Matthews)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesSharon Gehrig / Lori Chriscoe vs Mary Peterson / Katherine Fulcomer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Augustine / Virginia Jenkins vs Nadine Neel / Shannon Pierle4-6, 4-6
2023-09-23vs AConger (Matthews)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Amy Adams vs AMY SAFIR / Debbie Miller0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMargaret Schrimsher / Rhonda Coumas vs Jennifer Gardiner / Janet Baker7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-09-16vs AConger (Matthews)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Salvucci / Ellen Smith vs Jennifer Gardiner / Arlene Conger3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Adams / Debbie Carmazzi vs Nadine Neel / Katherine Fulcomer6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-09-09vs AConger (Matthews)Split 11
L#1 DoublesLynn Davis / Lori Chriscoe vs Arlene Conger / Mary Peterson2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Gehrig / Virginia Jenkins vs Tracy Brading / Karen Schmit7-5, 6-0
2023-09-02vs AConger (Matthews)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJosie Shuford / Amy Augustine vs Pamela Beecher / Janet Baker6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Steyl / Margaret Schrimsher vs Dorothy Cato / Karen Schmit6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-26vs AConger (Matthews)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Gehrig / Debbie Carmazzi vs Dorothy Cato / Amy Nielsen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-19vs AConger (Matthews)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBarbara Salvucci / Amy Augustine vs Jennifer Gardiner / Karen Schmit4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Steyl / Lori Chriscoe vs Nadine Neel / Amy Nielsen5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 8.5 Women - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Janet Steyl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Josie Shuford
published
4.24
Leslie Peterson
published
4.23
Sharon Gehrig
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.00
Rhonda Coumas
published
3.98
Amy Augustine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Barbara Salvucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Debbie Carmazzi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Nan Miller
published
3.71
Lori Chriscoe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Margaret Schrimsher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Steyl + Barbara Salvucci7647% games−5.4% vs expected
Amy Augustine + Barbara Salvucci2546% gamesnot enough data
Amy Augustine + Sharon Gehrig5159% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Salvucci + Margaret Schrimsher3351% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Gehrig + Janet Steyl314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Augustine + Margaret Schrimsher123 matchesnot enough data
Janet Steyl + Margaret Schrimsher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Janet Steyl
44W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
Josie Shuford
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.25
Leslie Peterson
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Sharon Gehrig
44W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Rhonda Coumas
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
4.00
4
Amy Augustine
95W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Barbara Salvucci
62W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Debbie Carmazzi
67W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Nan Miller
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Lori Chriscoe
77W–43L career · 8 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Margaret Schrimsher
98W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.