Teams

So Cal Ramos

2021 18 & OVER 5.5 · OPEN INVITATIONAL

6 players · average NTRP 5.12 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · OPEN INVITATIONAL
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1So Cal Ramos3193787
2PNW Leah Gray224816114
3Midwest Hamilton135714116
4Intermo Palomaki0421020122

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 5.03 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.29
Alison Vogel
published 5.5
4.97
Hannah Holladay
published 5
4.83
Tricia Mar
published
Cassie Bergeson
published 5
Madeline Segura
published 5
Margaret Adler
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Alison Vogel
8W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
5.29
5
Hannah Holladay
5W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
4.97
Tricia Mar
7W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%89%10%
4.83
5
Cassie Bergeson
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
5
Madeline Segura
39W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Margaret Adler
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.