Teams

Raymond/40's/3.0AW/For

2025 Monroe Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Monroe (40&O) Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-06vs Klitz/40's/3.0AW/MacWon 40
W#1 DoublesSarah Raymond / Brandee Yarbrough vs Jessica Stutts / Kelly Rutz6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCindy Gibson vs Stacey Majure6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAimee Hayward / Anna Robinson vs Lisa Livigni / Kristy Rizzo6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Robinson / Tiffany Turpin vs Eleanor Funderburk / Amy Fakhre7-6, 6-3
2025-04-04vs Klitz/40's/3.0AW/MacWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnna Robinson / Tiffany Turpin vs Lisa Livigni / Kristy Rizzo6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmy Robinson vs Amy Fakhre6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndree Eddleman / Felicia Hardwick vs Stacey Majure / Jennifer Turpin6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCindy Gibson / Mary Durham vs Erin Klitzke / Eleanor Funderburk6-1, 6-0
2025-04-03vs Klitz/40's/3.0AW/MacWon 40
W#1 DoublesFelicia Hardwick / Mary Durham vs Erin Klitzke / Eleanor Funderburk6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTiffany Turpin vs Jennifer Turpin6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Raymond / Brandee Yarbrough vs Jessica Stutts / Kelly Rutz6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAndree Eddleman / Aimee Hayward vs Lisa Livigni / Kristy Rizzo6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Monroe (40&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Brandee Yarbrough
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.08
Tiffany Turpin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.01
Cindy Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.99
Andree Eddleman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Aimee Hayward
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Sarah Raymond
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Anna Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Mary Durham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Amy Robinson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Felicia Hardwick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brandee Yarbrough
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Tiffany Turpin
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Cindy Gibson
8W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Andree Eddleman
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Aimee Hayward
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Sarah Raymond
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Anna Robinson
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Mary Durham
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Amy Robinson
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Felicia Hardwick
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.