Teams

APEX.Long

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 40 & Over · Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-06vs CAS.HayesLost 01
L#1 SinglesSharon Fadelici vs Cari DeCandia2-6, 1-6
2023-11-02Won 10
W#3 SinglesKimberly Latzy vs Michele Cohen6-0, 6-0
2023-10-26vs CAS.HayesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKristi Laan vs Ninell Mortensen5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesSharon Fadelici vs Diane Hayes6-0, 6-2
2023-10-26Won 10
W#2 SinglesKimberly Latzy vs Lisa Goodman6-1, 6-0
2023-10-09vs TOC.CohenSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Devon Wadsworth2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesSharon Fadelici vs Elizabeth Parrish6-4, 6-2
2023-10-05Won 10
W#3 SinglesKristi Laan vs Jacqueline Carrelha6-2, 6-2
2023-09-25Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKristi Laan vs Ninell Mortensen6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-09-21Won 20
W#1 SinglesKimberly Latzy vs Chrissy Morgan6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Michele Cohen7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Kristi Laan
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Kimberly Latzy
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Sharon Fadelici
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.89
Kristen Henderson
published
2.83
Tracy Grasser
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.79
Audrey Hollett
published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.77
Lisa Brandman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Grasser + Sharon Fadelici9855% games+3.8% vs expected
Audrey Hollett + Sharon Fadelici8650% games−1.1% vs expected
Tracy Grasser + Kimberly Latzy7160% gamesnot enough data
Kristi Laan + Tracy Grasser123 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Fadelici + Kimberly Latzy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristi Laan
262W–181L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Kimberly Latzy
111W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
3
Sharon Fadelici
183W–140L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.93
Kristen Henderson
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Tracy Grasser
145W–131L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Audrey Hollett
33W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Lisa Brandman
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.