Teams

Miller - Highland Country Club

2025 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 2.5 Adult Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-15vs Long - MazarickWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllene Bullock / Nisha Patel vs Lisa Long / Mari Lesniak6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLyndsey Gardner vs Melissa Broadwater7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTaylor England / Maddie Cohen vs Dawn Burt / Jacqui Cannon6-2, 6-1
2025-05-05vs Bullard - Highland Country ClubWon 21
L#1 DoublesLyndsey Gardner / Courtney Samuelson vs Katie Bullard / Anne Catherine Williams3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAllene Bullock vs Courtney McDaniel6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Miller / Taylor England vs Madeline McFadyen / Tyler Chavonne6-1, 6-2
2025-04-14vs Long - MazarickSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Miller / Meredith Wermel vs Theresa Jones / Sandra Martin6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAllison Davis / Caroline Garber vs Dawn Burt / Melissa Broadwater3-6, 3-6
2025-03-24vs Bullard - Highland Country ClubWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaddie Cohen / Meredith Wermel vs Anne Catherine Williams / Tyler Chavonne1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLyndsey Gardner vs Taylor Henrickson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesReston Chambers / Jessica Smith vs Casie Burgos / Anna Owen6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Eimy Rojas deBeck
published 2.5
3.01
Taylor England
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Lyndsey Gardner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Allene Bullock
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.51
Reston Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Maddie Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Renee Olive
published
2.48
Courtney Samuelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Meredith Wermel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Allison Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Caroline Garber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Eimy Rojas deBeck
2W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.50
Taylor England
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Lyndsey Gardner
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.75
3
Allene Bullock
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Reston Chambers
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
Maddie Cohen
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%52%48%
2.49
Renee Olive
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.49
3
Courtney Samuelson
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Meredith Wermel
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
Allison Davis
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Caroline Garber
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.