Teams

MERVYN MORRIS PK 55AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-17vs LANEY TA/Encinal HS 55AM7.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesDave Miller / Antonio Robles vs David Kardon / ALEX S WHANG6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDennis Black / Tan Nguyen vs Daniel Bao / Alan Wong2-6, 6-7
2025-05-04vs LANEY TA/Encinal HS 55AM7.0ALost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Chin / Chen Zhang vs Mark Morissette / Shun Hung6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKen Fagel / Nick Halatsis vs Jeff Gear / Daniel Bao6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDennis Black / Tan Nguyen vs Alan Wong / Gary Fries5-7, 4-6
2025-04-12vs LANEY TA/Encinal HS 55AM7.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Diamond / Antonio Robles vs Keith Ma / ALEX S WHANG1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDave Miller / Chen Zhang vs Andreas Berner / Steve Ghidinelli6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJohn Chin / Chester Low vs Mark Abzug / Jeff Gear1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Chen Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Dave Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Ken Fagel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Tom Betts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
David Diamond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Paul Purdy
published
3.22
Antonio Robles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Chester Low
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Dennis Black
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Randall Lee
published
Jason Ehrlich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Chin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nick Halatsis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Miller + Chen Zhang4167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chen Zhang
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Dave Miller
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Ken Fagel
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Tom Betts
13W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
David Diamond
1W–4L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paul Purdy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Antonio Robles
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Chester Low
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Dennis Black
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Randall Lee
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jason Ehrlich
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
John Chin
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Halatsis
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.