Teams

Blue

2026 Holding League · Women

23 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Blue000000
2Orange000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Angela Bleak
published 4
3.75
Carolyn Silverstein
published 4.5
3.62
Melanie Hall
published
3.61
Angie Haskins
published 4
3.53
Janee Roper
published 4
3.46
Amelia Linscott
published 4
3.30
Haley H Moreno
published
3.16
Tiffany Ashman
published
3.09
Lori Curtis
published
3.08
Angela Rasmussen
published 3.5
3.04
Ally Lyle
published 3
2.96
Erin Olson
published
2.93
Sandra Chamberlain
published 3.5
2.78
Jinqiu Zhang
published
2.66
Aishan Zhong
published 3
2.63
Elaine Day
published 3
2.49
Nicole Langlie
published 3
2.47
Nancy Holman
published
2.44
Amelia Blotter
published 2.5
2.22
Nahal Rad
published
Megan Koch
published
Noella Sudbury
published
Sarah Blake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Ashman + Lori Curtis171249% games−0.6% vs expected
Tiffany Ashman + Janee Roper5056% gamesnot enough data
Janee Roper + Angela Bleak5070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Bleak
214W–163L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4.5
Carolyn Silverstein
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.75
Melanie Hall
61W–53L career · no lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
3.62
4
Angie Haskins
92W–97L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Janee Roper
146W–123L career · type A · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Amelia Linscott
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Haley H Moreno
82W–46L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Tiffany Ashman
97W–89L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Lori Curtis
85W–110L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Angela Rasmussen
17W–32L career · no lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.08
3
Ally Lyle
43W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Erin Olson
2W–20L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96
3.5
Sandra Chamberlain
84W–85L career · no lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
Jinqiu Zhang
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Aishan Zhong
15W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Elaine Day
123W–244L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Nicole Langlie
11W–8L career · type D · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Nancy Holman
26W–35L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
2.5
Amelia Blotter
14W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Nahal Rad
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Megan Koch
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Noella Sudbury
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Blake
24W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.