Teams

MV HARPER/RILEY

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 2.5

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-07vs BIR CONRAD/LINGTONLost 12
W#1 DoublesKirsten Bescher / Amber Snider vs Erica Mulcahy / Shannon Morgan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDebi Arias vs Kayli Conrad1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Vallance / Lindsay Lee vs Shaun Lington / Tia McBrien6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-14vs MCL MEYER/THOMASSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLindsay Lee / Beth Buss vs Susan Cole / Ambree Smith5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Irsaneous / Debi Arias vs Leanne Couch / Alyssa Honer6-2, 6-2
2025-03-07vs RID DIAZWon 30
W#1 DoublesKirsten Bescher / Erin Gillean vs Rachel Payne / Danielle Dollahite6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGwendolyn Harper vs Lauren Diaz6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Buss / Katie Irsaneous vs Jeanie Armstrong / Laurel Roenbrook7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Gwendolyn Harper
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.60
Erin Gillean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Kirsten Bescher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Lindsay Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Chelsea Geesbreght
published 2.5
2.42
Lacey Cleland
published
2.30
LaToyer Houston
published
2.27
Amber Snider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Shawn Fershtand
published
2.20
Beth Buss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.09
Raleigh Trout
published
2.05
Debi Arias
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.00
Donna Vallance
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Irsaneous
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Lee + Beth Buss044 matchesnot enough data
Donna Vallance + Lindsay Lee033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gwendolyn Harper
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Erin Gillean
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
Kirsten Bescher
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%41%59%
2.53
Lindsay Lee
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52
2.5
Chelsea Geesbreght
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Lacey Cleland
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.42
LaToyer Houston
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Amber Snider
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Shawn Fershtand
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Beth Buss
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Raleigh Trout
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Debi Arias
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Donna Vallance
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Katie Irsaneous
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.