Teams

SGV Chic Netsetters - Yamamoto - WN

2021 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesCynthia Garcia / Trish Newlin vs Satsuki Yamashita / Kelly Moss3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMae Huey / Sabrina Wedge vs Virginia Takeuchi / Amy Hasquet4-6, 3-6
2021-05-16vs SGV Team Snorlax - Manley- WNWon 10
W#2 DoublesMae Huey / Maryann Yamamoto vs Laurie Manley / Lauren Nicole Finke6-2, 6-3
2021-05-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesTrish Newlin / Jacquetta Perkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesJacquetta Perkins / Trish Newlin vs Aydee Martinez / Sarah Wong1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-24vs SGV Chow Fun - Chow - WNWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaryann Yamamoto / Trish Newlin vs Tammy Pronenko / Marites Killion7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2021-04-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMae Huey / Regina Gov vs Katie Bae / Wei Zhang2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Trish Newlin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Lisa Lerg
published
3.43
Gladys Tan
published 3.5
3.40
Maryann Yamamoto
published
3.34
Jacquetta Perkins
published 3.5
3.14
Kathy Wilkinson
published
3.14
Sabrina Wedge
published
3.13
Regina Gov
published
3.05
Mae Huey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Sandy Weyant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mae Huey + Maryann Yamamoto044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Trish Newlin
55W–112L career · 4 lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.59
Lisa Lerg
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Gladys Tan
3W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
Maryann Yamamoto
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Jacquetta Perkins
24W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.34
Kathy Wilkinson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14
Sabrina Wedge
2W–15L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
Regina Gov
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Mae Huey
18W–86L career · 3 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.05
Sandy Weyant
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.