← Teams

MPRC-Brinck

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Kendra Rothert
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.15
Yan Morrissey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Jean Schnadig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Stephanie Hoover
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.96
Wendy Simons
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.92
Qin Lian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Lee Gates
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.60
Laura Davies
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-06-11Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Brinck / Stephanie Hoover vs Jennifer Pultz / Kathleen Crowley6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesQin Lian / MaryAnn Nickel vs Luz Zanavich / Kate Maher6-2, 6-2
2022-06-05Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKendra Rothert / Jean Schnadig vs Valerie Neill / Christina Melander6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaryAnn Nickel / Qin Lian vs Shannon Davis / Barbara Lolich6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarjorie Brinck / Stephanie Hoover vs Pamela Meyer / Michelle Cortez6-2, 7-5
2022-05-29Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesKendra Rothert / Jean Schnadig vs Jodi Wilkins / Autumn Bunch2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Davies / Lee Gates vs Jennifer Trank / Sumner Brooks6-4, 7-5
2022-05-20Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJean Schnadig / Wendy Simons vs Autumn Bunch / Shannon Darrow7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTracy Lee / Yan Morrissey vs Jennifer Trank / Tricia Wimmer6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLee Gates / Marina Song vs Linnette Donohue / Lillian Lee6-4, 6-0
2022-05-01Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesStephanie Hoover / Kendra Rothert vs Delena Palena / Tamara Phillips6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLee Gates vs ROSY ALANIS6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Davies / Jean Schnadig vs Barbara Pasmore / Jill Watson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesQin Lian / Wendy Simons vs Margaret Huck / Laura Kaufman6-2, 6-1
2022-04-24Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesStephanie Hoover / Kendra Rothert vs Rebecca Griffith / Patricia Nierenberg6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLee Gates vs Phyllis Ghazi7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Bradley / Jean Schnadig vs Becky Nelson / Heidi Palena6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana Kitchin / Wendy Simons vs Teresa Darling / Alana Rhea7-5, 6-3
2022-04-23Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesLee Gates / Marina Song vs Edwardeen Hilts / Rachel Young6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKendra Rothert vs Melanie Morris6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hoover / Jean Schnadig vs Courtney Laing / Sara Crate3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaryAnn Nickel / Wendy Simons vs Megan Heyworth / Julie Motschenbacher6-1, 6-3
2022-04-09Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSusan Bradley / Kendra Rothert vs Becky Nelson / Heidi Palena7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesYan Morrissey / Wendy Simons vs Rebecca Griffith / Patricia Nierenberg6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Kendra Rothert
46W–56L career
4%96%0%
3.18
3.5
Yan Morrissey
54W–73L career
5%95%0%
3.15
3
Jean Schnadig
43W–40L career
0%56%44%
3.09
3
Stephanie Hoover
14W–8L career
0%79%21%
2.96
3
Wendy Simons
33W–39L career
0%89%11%
2.96
3
Qin Lian
32W–26L career
0%90%10%
2.92
3
Lee Gates
83W–68L career
0%99%0%
2.77
3
Laura Davies
38W–39L career
17%83%0%
2.60

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.